Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36926085›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in network physiology2022

Differentiating acute from chronic insomnia with machine learning from actigraphy time series data.

S Rani, S Shelyag, C Karmakar, Ye Zhu, R Fossion, J G Ellis, S P A Drummond, M Angelova

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in network physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S RaniSchool of Information Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
S ShelyagSchool of Information Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
C KarmakarSchool of Information Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Ye ZhuSchool of Information Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
R FossionCentro de Ciencias de la Complejidad (C3) and Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX, Mexico.
J G EllisDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
S P A DrummondTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
M AngelovaSchool of Information Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute and chronic insomnia have different causes and may require different treatments. They are investigated with multi-night nocturnal actigraphy data from two sleep studies. Two different wrist-worn actigraphy devices were used to measure physical activities. This required data pre-processing and transformations to smooth the differences between devices. Statistical, power spectrum, fractal and entropy analyses were used to derive features from the actigraphy data. Sleep parameters were also extracted from the signals. The features were then submitted to four machine learning algorithms. The best performing model was able to distinguish acute from chronic insomnia with an accuracy of 81%. The algorithms were then used to evaluate the acute and chronic groups compared to healthy sleepers. The differences between acute insomnia and healthy sleep were more prominent than between chronic insomnia and healthy sleep. This may be associated with the adaptation of the physiology to prolonged periods of disturbed sleep for individuals with chronic insomnia. The new model is a powerful addition to our suite of machine learning models aiming to pre-screen insomnia at home with wearable devices.

Indexed as

actigraphyacute insomniachronic insomniadynamical featuresinsomnia detectionmachine learningsleep parameters

Identifiers

PMID36926085
PMCPMC10013073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read43
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.