Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36926051›Full record

ReviewDrugs in context2023

HR

Rosalba Torrisi, Flavia Jacobs, Chiara Miggiano, Rita De Sanctis, Armando Santoro

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs in context, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Initial clinical experience with ribociclib in advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer in Uruguay].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosalba TorrisiIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Milan, Italy.
Flavia JacobsIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Milan, Italy.
Chiara MiggianoIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Milan, Italy.
Rita De SanctisIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Milan, Italy.
Armando SantoroIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Milan, Italy.
Humanitas University · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

De novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) accounts for ~6-10% of all breast cancers and for ~30% of MBC with increasing incidence over time. Hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR

Indexed as

HR+/HER2− de novo metastatic breast cancerlocoregional treatmentstage IV breast cancersystemic therapy

Identifiers

PMID36926051
PMCPMC10012832
OpenAlexW4323313549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.