Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36925918›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Combining distance and anatomical information for deep-learning based dose distribution predictions for nasopharyngeal cancer radiotherapy planning.

Xinyuan Chen, Ji Zhu, Bining Yang, Deqi Chen, Kuo Men, Jianrong Dai

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xinyuan ChenNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ji ZhuNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Bining YangNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Deqi ChenNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Kuo MenNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jianrong DaiNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Deep-learning effectively predicts dose distributions in knowledge-based radiotherapy planning. Using anatomical information that includes a structure map and computed tomography (CT) data as input has been proven to work well. The minimum distance from each voxel in normal structures to planning target volume (DPTV) closely affects each voxel's dose. In this study, we combined DPTV and anatomical information as input for a deep-learning-based dose-prediction network to improve performance. Materials and methods: One hundred patients who underwent volumetric-modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer were selected in this study. The prediction model based on a residual network had DPTV maps, structure maps, and CT as inputs and the corresponding dose distribution maps as outputs. The performances of the combined distance and anatomical information (COM) model and the traditional anatomical (ANAT) model with two-channel inputs (structure maps and CT) were compared. A 10-fold cross validation was performed to separately train and test the COM and ANAT models. The voxel-based mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), dosimetric parameters, and dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of isodose volumes were used for modeling evaluation. Results: The mean MAE of the body volume of the COM model were 4.89 ± 1.35%, highly significantly lower than those for the ANAT model of 5.07 ± 1.37% ( Conclusions: The COM model outperformed the ANAT model and could improve automated planning with statistically highly significant differences.

Indexed as

anatomical informationdeep-learningdose-predictionminimum distanceradiotherapy treatment planning

Identifiers

PMID36925918
PMCPMC10012276
OpenAlexW4323309923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read25
table measurements read3
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.