Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36925894›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2022

Sustaining capacity building and evidence-based NCD intervention implementation: Perspectives from the GRIT consortium.

Ashlin Rakhra, Shivani Mishra, Angela Aifah, Calvin Colvin, Joyce Gyamfi, Gbenga Ogedegbe, Juliet Iwelunmor

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashlin RakhraNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Shivani MishraNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Angela AifahNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Calvin ColvinNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Joyce GyamfiNew York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Gbenga OgedegbeNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Juliet IwelunmorDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, College for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.

Funding

Uptake of Task-Shifting Strategy for Blood Pressure Control in Community Health Planning Services: A Mixed Method StudyU01HL138638 · NHLBI · KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY/SCIENCE/TECH · PI ASANTE, KWAKU POKU, OGEDEGBE, OLUGBENGA G. · 2017 to 2021
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL138638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Implementation science has been primarily focused on adoption of evidence-based interventions, and less so on sustainability, creating a gap in the field. The Global Research on Implementation and Translation Science (GRIT) Consortium is funded by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHBLI) to support the planning, implementation, and sustainability of Late-Stage Phase 4 Translational Research (T4TR) and capacity building for NCD prevention and control in eight low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). This paper highlights perspectives, including barriers, facilitators, opportunities, and motivators for sustaining capacity building and evidence-based hypertension interventions within LMICs. Methods: Guided by the Capacity, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior (COM-B) Model, this study surveyed GRIT consortium members on the barriers, facilitators, key motivators, and opportunities for sustaining capacity building and evidence-based hypertension interventions in LMICs. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes and patterns across responses. Results: Twenty-five consortium members across all eight sites and from various research levels responded to the survey. Overarching themes identifying facilitators, key motivators and opportunities for sustainability included: (1) access to structured and continuous training and mentorship; (2) project integration with existing systems (i.e., political systems and health systems); (3) adaption to the local context of studies (i.e., accounting for policies, resources, and utilizing stakeholder engagement); and (4) development of interventions with decision makers and implementers. Barriers to sustainability included local policies and lack of infrastructure, unreliable access to hypertension medications, and lack of sufficient staff, time, and funding. Conclusion: Sustainability is an important implementation outcome to address in public health interventions, particularly as it pertains to the success of these initiatives. This study provides perspectives on the sustainability of NCD interventions with a focus on mitigating their NCD burden in LMICs. Addressing multilevel factors that influence the sustainability of capacity building and interventions will have notable implications for other global NCD efforts going forward. Current and future studies, as well as consortium networks, should account for sustainability barriers outlined as it will strengthen program implementation, and long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

capacity buildingevidence-based interventionsimplementation scienceLMICs (low and middle income countries)non–communicable diseasessustainability

Identifiers

PMID36925894
PMCPMC10012828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read66
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.