Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36925892›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2022

"There is always a waitlist": The experiences of perinatal women randomized to a waitlist condition in a trial evaluating a novel online self-directed intervention for perinatal anxiety.

Amanda J Kristjanson, Madison P Hardman, Kailey E Penner, Megan E Gornik, Teaghan A M Pryor, Sarah K Petty, Gillian M Alcolado, Patricia Furer, Kristin A Reynolds

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Sleeping for Two: a randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in pregnancy.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amanda J KristjansonDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Madison P HardmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Kailey E PennerDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Megan E GornikDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Teaghan A M PryorDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Sarah K PettyDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Gillian M AlcoladoDepartment of Clinical Health Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Patricia FurerDepartment of Clinical Health Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Kristin A ReynoldsDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pregnant and postpartum women are at a heightened risk for the development or worsening of mental health problems, with elevated rates of mood and anxiety disorders noted across studies. Timely access to mental health supports is critical during the perinatal period (spanning pregnancy to 1 year postpartum), to mitigate potential negative impacts on mother and child. In general adult populations, a small body of research has highlighted the association between being waitlisted for mental health services with a deterioration in mental health. Given the influx of changes experienced in the perinatal period, this population may face unique challenges around being waitlisted. There is a lack of research exploring the experiences of perinatal women waitlisted for psychological services. The current study seeks to understand the experiences of perinatal women randomized to the waitlist condition of a randomized controlled trial. Methods: Results: Seven main themes were identified, depicting the waitlist experiences of perinatal participants: (a) "There is always a waitlist" (sub-themes: service availability, need to seek out services pre-emptively); (b) Timing of support access is vital during the perinatal period (sub-themes: prenatal, postpartum); (c) Responses to being waitlisted (sub-themes: disappointment, neutral, relief, "there's probably somebody that needs it more than I do"); (d) Identification of helpful supports during the waitlist period (sub-themes: formal supports, informal supports); (e) Connections with research team (sub-themes: communication, resource provision); (f) Impact of waitlist experience on desire to start program (sub-themes: excitement, "out of sight, out of mind," nervousness); and (g) Improving the waitlist experience (sub-themes: communication, resource provision, triaging). Discussion: Findings highlight the need for timely access to mental health supports during the perinatal period and offer several recommendations for improving the waitlist experience, including providing more frequent waitlist status updates, providing more direct access to intermediate interventions, and triaging patients based on clinical need.

Indexed as

anxietymental healthmental health servicesperinatalqualitativethematic analysiswaitlist experiences

Identifiers

PMID36925892
PMCPMC10012752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read41
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.