Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36925869›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2022

Engaging frontline workers in policy development to support the implementation of measurement-based care: Lessons learned from a field-based workgroup.

Rajinder Sonia Singh, Sara J Landes, Sandra G Resnick, Traci H Abraham, Kelly P Maieritsch, Stacey J Pollack, JoAnn E Kirchner

Open access · diamondFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rajinder Sonia SinghUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Veterans Health Administration, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Sara J LandesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Sandra G ResnickNortheast Program Evaluation Center, Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, New Haven, CT, United States.
Traci H AbrahamUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Veterans Health Administration, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Kelly P MaieritschExecutive Division, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Hartford, VT, United States.
Stacey J PollackOffice of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention VA Central Office, Washington, DC, United States.
JoAnn E KirchnerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
New York State Office of Mental Health · USUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs · USNational Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder · USQuality Enhancement Research Initiative · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurement-Based Care (MBC) is the use of patient-reported outcome measures repeatedly over the course of treatment to track progress and empower both providers and patients to collaboratively set goals and plan treatment. The Measurement-Based Care in Mental Health Initiative within the Department of Veterans Affairs' Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention partnered with the Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Mentoring Program to create an interdisciplinary field-based workgroup. The workgroup included psychologists, clinical social workers, and mental health counselors from PTSD Clinical Teams. The task of the workgroup was to create guidelines for best practice in delivery of MBC in PTSD Clinical Teams given anticipated policy requiring MBC to be used in PTSD Clinical Teams. Framed in the Strategic Action Field Framework for Policy Implementation Research, the current paper evaluates this hybrid top-down and bottom-up process of policy development. Major barriers included difficulty with the workgroup as an authentic bottom-up process, inability to reach the entire field (e.g., focus groups not widely attended by providers), and limited diversity in the workgroup. Facilitators included using consensus to make decisions, support provided to workgroup members by national operations partners, and collaboration and mutual respect among workgroup members. Workgroup members noted an equal, respectful partnership between operations partners and the workgroup; they reported feeling empowered and believed the viewpoints of the field were included in the guidelines. Further, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the workgroup included more guidelines specific to telehealth into the guidelines. This hybrid model provides a process through which frontline workers can inform policy development and implementation.

Indexed as

measurement-based carepolicypolicy developmentpolicy implementationposttraumatic stress disorder

Identifiers

PMID36925869
PMCPMC10012816
OpenAlexW4290546798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.