Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36925820›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2022

Mobile phone-based lifestyle support for families with young children in primary health care (MINISTOP 2.0): Exploring behavioral change determinants for implementation using the COM-B model.

Kristin Thomas, Margit Neher, Christina Alexandrou, Ulrika Müssener, Hanna Henriksson, Marie Löf

Open access · diamondFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin ThomasDivision of Society and Health, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Margit NeherDepartment of Rehabilitation, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Christina AlexandrouDivision of Society and Health, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Ulrika MüssenerDivision of Society and Health, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Hanna HenrikssonDivision of Society and Health, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Marie LöfDivision of Society and Health, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Linköping University · SEJönköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Obesity in childhood is a public health concern worldwide and mobile phone-based interventions (mHealth) has shown to facilitate obesity prevention. However, more research is needed on the implementation of digital tools in routine primary care. This study explored behavior change determinants for implementing a health promotion mHealth intervention (MINISTOP 2.0 app) targeting parents of 4-year-olds. Methods: Secondary data from telephone interviews ( Results: Barriers for implementation included: limited knowledge about using technology and reservations about how and to what extent parents would use mHealth. Potential facilitators included nurses' openness to learn and try new tools, confidence in their role and engagement in reaching parents as well as beliefs that the app could improve practice by prompting dialogue and being a shared platform. Nurses expressed a strong professional identity and shared understanding of their practice, mechanisms that could potentially inhibit or facilitate implementation. Conclusions: Findings suggest cautious optimism regarding implementing mobile phone-based tools in child primary healthcare in terms of capability, opportunity and motivation among stakeholders. Implementation strategies such as educational outreach visits and making the intervention testable among stakeholders could further facilitate implementation in this clinical context. However, more research is needed on behavior change determinants in different stages of real-world implementation.

Indexed as

implementation science (MeSH)implementation theory and researchmobile Health (mHealth)primary healthcarequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID36925820
PMCPMC10012784
OpenAlexW4307864828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.