Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36925733›Full record

ArticleOcular oncology and pathology2023

Recurrence of Primary Acquired Melanosis and Conjunctival Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Karin Svedberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ocular oncology and pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karin SvedbergDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of recurrences, time to recurrence, and which patients had a recurrence after treatment of conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), carcinoma in situ, and primary acquired melanosis (PAM) with atypia. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients included in the follow-up program after completion of treatment for CIN or PAM with atypia on October 18, 2021, at the Department of Ophthalmology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, was conducted. Results: There were five recurrences (5/31, 17%) in the group with CIN or carcinoma in situ: two for patients with CIN grade II and three for individuals with carcinoma in situ. Time to diagnosis of recurrence ranged from 6 to 288 months. No recurrence was diagnosed for the 26 patients followed after treatment for PAM with atypia. Conclusion: With the strategy of radical treatment for CIN and PAM with atypia, whenever possible, subsequent follow-up can probably be ceased after 10 years if the patient is not immunocompromised. For completely excised PAM with atypia grade I, there is most likely no need for further clinical controls.

Indexed as

Conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasiaFollow-upPremalignantPrimary acquired melanosisRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID36925733
PMCPMC10013497
OpenAlexW4295788943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.