Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36925674›Full record

ReviewBioengineering & translational medicine2023

Recent progress in the manipulation of biochemical and biophysical cues for engineering functional tissues.

Behnaz Bakhshandeh, Nika Ranjbar, Ardeshir Abbasi, Elahe Amiri, Ali Abedi, Mohammad-Reza Mehrabi, Zahra Dehghani, Cristian Pablo Pennisi

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Alveolar Bone Regeneration: Smart Biomaterials and Physical Stimulation.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Rise of Mechanobiology for Advanced Cell Engineering and Manufacturing.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Engineering the Immune Response to Biomaterials.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Behnaz BakhshandehDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Science University of Tehran Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1252-6088
Nika RanjbarDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Science University of Tehran Tehran Iran.
Ardeshir AbbasiDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medical Sciences Tarbiat Modares University Tehran Iran.
Elahe AmiriDepartment of Life Science Engineering, Faculty of New Sciences and Technology University of Tehran Tehran Iran.
Ali AbediDepartment of Life Science Engineering, Faculty of New Sciences and Technology University of Tehran Tehran Iran.
Mohammad-Reza MehrabiDepartment of Microbial Biotechnology, School of Biology, College of Science University of Tehran Tehran Iran.
Zahra DehghaniDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Science University of Tehran Tehran Iran.
Cristian Pablo PennisiRegenerative Medicine Group, Department of Health Science and Technology Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7716-1182

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering (TE) is currently considered a cutting-edge discipline that offers the potential for developing treatments for health conditions that negatively affect the quality of life. This interdisciplinary field typically involves the combination of cells, scaffolds, and appropriate induction factors for the regeneration and repair of damaged tissue. Cell fate decisions, such as survival, proliferation, or differentiation, critically depend on various biochemical and biophysical factors provided by the extracellular environment during developmental, physiological, and pathological processes. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms of action of these factors is critical to accurately mimic the complex architecture of the extracellular environment of living tissues and improve the efficiency of TE approaches. In this review, we recapitulate the effects that biochemical and biophysical induction factors have on various aspects of cell fate. While the role of biochemical factors, such as growth factors, small molecules, extracellular matrix (ECM) components, and cytokines, has been extensively studied in the context of TE applications, it is only recently that we have begun to understand the effects of biophysical signals such as surface topography, mechanical, and electrical signals. These biophysical cues could provide a more robust set of stimuli to manipulate cell signaling pathways during the formation of the engineered tissue. Furthermore, the simultaneous application of different types of signals appears to elicit synergistic responses that are likely to improve functional outcomes, which could help translate results into successful clinical therapies in the future.

Indexed as

biochemical cuesbiophysical cuesdifferentiationinduction factorstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID36925674
PMCPMC10013802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read18
identifiers read13
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.