ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2023
Culture intelligent workflow, structure, and steps.
Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population health management through human phenotype ontology with policy for ecosystem improvement.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Population health management fit lifecycles in analytics.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Technologies abstract intelligence and provide predictor and precision insight in workflows that manage disorders, similar to cardiology and hematological disease. Positive perceptions of Artificial Intelligence (AI) that support Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) manage transformations with a safe system that improves wellbeing. In sections, workflow introduces an eXamination (X = AI) as an end-to-end structure to culture workstreams in a step-by-step design to manage populace health in a governed system. Method: To better healthcare outcomes, communities and personnel benefit from an explanation and an interpretive that elucidates workflow for citizens or practitioners to comprehend personalized platforms. Therefore, the author undertook structure and practice reviews and appraised perspectives that impact the management of AI in public health and medicine. Results: Figures for the management of AI workflow illustrate and inform on the model, structure, culture, assurance, process steps, values, and governance required for abstract insights in public health and medicine. The papers' end-to-end structure with explanans in a work culture interprets the step-by-step designs that manage the success of AI. Personalized care graphics offer an explanandum in the management of biological analytic value. Discussion: Healthcare leadership collaboratives plan population health with an upstream, workplace and workstream format. Secure workflow and safety wellbeing system requirements prove that genomics and AI improve medicine. Therefore, the paper discusses group understanding of current practice, ethics, policy, and legality. Conclusion: "Culture, intelligent workflow, structure, and steps" improve wellbeing with personalized care and align a percept for national opportunities, regional control, and local needs. Personalized practice cultures support analytic systems to describe, predict, precision, and prescript medicine in population health management eXaminations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.