Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36925567›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in network physiology2021

Measuring the Rate of Information Exchange in Point-Process Data With Application to Cardiovascular Variability.

Gorana Mijatovic, Riccardo Pernice, Alessio Perinelli, Yuri Antonacci, Alessandro Busacca, Michal Javorka, Leonardo Ricci, Luca Faes

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in network physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Gorana MijatovicFaculty of Technical Science, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Riccardo PerniceDepartment of Engineering, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Alessio PerinelliCIMeC, Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Yuri AntonacciDepartment of Physics and Chemistry "Emilio Segrè," University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Alessandro BusaccaDepartment of Engineering, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Michal JavorkaDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Center Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Martin, Slovakia.
Leonardo RicciDepartment of Physics, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Luca FaesDepartment of Engineering, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
University of Palermo · ITUniversity of Trento · ITComenius University Bratislava · SKUniversity of Novi Sad · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The amount of information exchanged per unit of time between two dynamic processes is an important concept for the analysis of complex systems. Theoretical formulations and data-efficient estimators have been recently introduced for this quantity, known as the mutual information rate (MIR), allowing its continuous-time computation for event-based data sets measured as realizations of coupled point processes. This work presents the implementation of MIR for point process applications in Network Physiology and cardiovascular variability, which typically feature short and noisy experimental time series. We assess the bias of MIR estimated for uncoupled point processes in the frame of surrogate data, and we compensate it by introducing a corrected MIR (cMIR) measure designed to return zero values when the two processes do not exchange information. The method is first tested extensively in synthetic point processes including a physiologically-based model of the heartbeat dynamics and the blood pressure propagation times, where we show the ability of cMIR to compensate the negative bias of MIR and return statistically significant values even for weakly coupled processes. The method is then assessed in real point-process data measured from healthy subjects during different physiological conditions, showing that cMIR between heartbeat and pressure propagation times increases significantly during postural stress, though not during mental stress. These results document that cMIR reflects physiological mechanisms of cardiovascular variability related to the joint neural autonomic modulation of heart rate and arterial compliance.

Indexed as

cardiovascular time seriesheart rate variabilityinformation dynamicsmutual information ratepoint processes

Identifiers

PMID36925567
PMCPMC10013020
OpenAlexW4210438132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read29
table measurements read5
reference markers read8
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.