Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36925171›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2023

Delays in cancer care for children in low-income and middle-income countries: development of a composite vulnerability index.

Cesia Cotache-Condor, Hannah E Rice, Kristin Schroeder, Catherine Staton, Esther Majaliwa, Shenglan Tang, Henry E Rice, Emily R Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cesia Cotache-CondorDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Center for Global Surgery and Health Equity, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Hannah E RiceDuke Primary Care, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Kristin SchroederDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Pediatric Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Catherine StatonDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Duke School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Esther MajaliwaDivision of Pediatric Oncology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Shenglan TangDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Henry E RiceDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Center for Global Surgery and Health Equity, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Emily R SmithDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Center for Global Surgery and Health Equity, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Duke School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: emily.smith1@duke.edu.

Funding

Improving access to cancer care for children in Tanzania: Designing a health-systems interventionK01TW012181 · FIC · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Emily Smith · 2022 to 2026
$816k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW012181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly access to diagnosis and care is essential to improve rates of survival from childhood cancer, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Composite indices are increasingly used to compare country performance in many health fields. We aimed to develop a composite vulnerability index of risk of mortality associated with delays in care for childhood cancer in LMICs, and to compare the vulnerability index scores across countries.

methodsThe composite vulnerability index was built in ten steps. A previous systematic review of determinants of delays in cancer care for children guided data selection. We collected exposure variables (determinants of delays in care) and outcome variables (childhood cancer-related mortality) from several large datasets. Data were analysed with regression models to identify determinants of delays in care that contribute to childhood cancer mortality. Significant indicators were aggregated into domains according to the socio-ecological model. We used geospatial tools to summarise and compare the composite vulnerability index scores across countries.

findingsWe found that life expectancy, maternal education, fertility rate, availability of pathology services, bone marrow transplantation capacity, availability of treatment services (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery), number of pharmacists per 10 000 population, country income level, and out-of-pocket health expenditure were significantly associated with cancer mortality for children in LMICs. The highest levels of vulnerability were found in sub-Saharan Africa.

interpretationOur composite vulnerability index can potentially serve as a valuable policy decision tool to help monitor country performance and guide interventions to reduce delays in care for children with cancer in LMICs.

fundingNone. TRANSLATIONS: For the Chinese, Portuguese, Arabic, Spanish and Swahili translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesNeoplasmsAfrica South of the SaharaChildHumansLife Expectancy

Identifiers

PMID36925171
PMCPMC10938288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.