Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36925089›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2023

Stimulating human prefrontal cortex increases reward learning.

Margot Juliëtte Overman, Verena Sarrazin, Michael Browning, Jacinta O'Shea

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Margot Juliëtte OvermanWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom; Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, OX3 7JX, United Kingdom; Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), University of Oxford, OX3 7JX, United Kingdom.
Verena SarrazinWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom; Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, OX3 7JX, United Kingdom; Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), University of Oxford, OX3 7JX, United Kingdom.
Michael BrowningDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, OX3 7JX, United Kingdom.
Jacinta O'SheaWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom; Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, OX3 7JX, United Kingdom; Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), University of Oxford, OX3 7JX, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jacinta.oshea@psych.ox.ac.uk.
Warneford Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR203316Medical Research Council MR/N008103/1Medical Research Council MR/N013468/1Wellcome Trust 203139Wellcome Trust 203139/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 215451Wellcome Trust 215451/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Work in computational psychiatry suggests that mood disorders may stem from aberrant reinforcement learning processes. Specifically, it has been proposed that depressed individuals believe that negative events are more informative than positive events, resulting in higher learning rates from negative outcomes (Pulcu and Browning, 2019). In this proof-of-concept study, we investigated whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, as commonly used in depression treatment trials, might change learning rates for affective outcomes. Healthy adults completed an established reinforcement learning task (Pulcu and Browning, 2017) in which the information content of reward and loss outcomes was manipulated by varying the volatility of stimulus-outcome associations. Learning rates on the tasks were quantified using computational models. Stimulation over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) but not motor cortex (M1) increased learning rates specifically for reward outcomes. The effects of prefrontal tDCS were cognitive state-dependent: tDCS applied during task performance increased learning rates for wins; tDCS applied before task performance decreased both win and loss learning rates. A replication study confirmed the key finding that tDCS to DLPFC during task performance increased learning rates specifically for rewards. Taken together, these findings demonstrate the potential of tDCS for modulating computational parameters of reinforcement learning that are relevant to mood disorders.

Indexed as

Motor CortexTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultHumansLearningPrefrontal CortexRewardAffective biasBrain stimulationLearning ratePrefrontal tDCSReinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID36925089
PMCPMC11968408
OpenAlexW4324387437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.