Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36924919›Full record

ReviewOsteoarthritis and cartilage2023

Osteoarthritis year in review 2022: imaging.

S Demehri, A Kasaeian, F W Roemer, A Guermazi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S DemehriMusculoskeletal Radiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: demehri2001@yahoo.com.
A KasaeianMusculoskeletal Radiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: skasaei1@jh.edu.
F W RoemerDepartment of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen & Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. Electronic address: Frank.Roemer@uk-erlangen.de.
A GuermaziDepartment of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: guermazi@bu.edu.

Funding

Effect of statin intake on Non-traumatic Generalized Knee OsteoarthritisR01AR079620 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DEMEHRI, SHADPOUR · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR079620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis narrative review summarizes original research focusing on imaging in osteoarthritis (OA) published between April 1st 2021 and March 31st 2022. We only considered English publications that were in vivo human studies.

methodsThe PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science databases were searched for "Osteoarthritis/OA" studies based on the search terms: "Radiography", "Ultrasound/US", "Computed Tomography/CT", "DXA", "Magnetic Resonance Imaging/MRI", "Artificial Intelligence/AI", and "Deep Learning". This review highlights the anatomical focus of research on the structures within the tibiofemoral, patellofemoral, hip, and hand joints. There is also a noted focus on artificial intelligence applications in OA imaging.

resultsOver the last decade, the increasing trend of using open-access large databases has reached a plateau (from 17 to 37). Compositional MRI has had the most prominent use in OA imaging and its biomarkers have been used in the detection of preclinical OA and prediction of OA outcomes. Most noteworthy, there has been an accelerated rate of publications on the implications of artificial intelligence, used in developing prediction models and performing trabecular texture analysis, in OA imaging (from 17 to 154).

conclusionsWhile imaging has maintained its key role in OA research, publication trends have shown an emphasis on the integration of AI. During the past year, MRI has maintained the highest prevalence in usage while US and CT remain as readily available modalities. Finally, there has been a notable uptake in the development and validation of AI techniques used to perform texture analysis and predict OA progression.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceOsteoarthritisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedArtificial intelligenceImagingOsteoarthritisReview

Identifiers

PMID36924919
PMCPMC12224773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.