ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2023
PDA-Pred: Predicting the binding affinity of protein-DNA complexes using machine learning techniques and structural features.
Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- A modular framework for automated segmentation and analysis of AFM imaging of chromatin organization.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- C620Y Mutation-Induced Destabilization of the Androgen Receptor Disrupts DNA Recognition Specificity in Prostate Cancer: Insights from Extensive Parametric Normal Mode Simulations.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Article
- A Rahman Syndrome mutation in histone H1.4 disrupts chromatin compaction and phase separation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- PANTHER Score: Protein-Affinity for Nucleic Target-binding, Hybridization, and Energy Regression.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- CAP: Commutative algebra prediction of protein-nucleic acid binding affinities.Machine learning: science and technology · 2025Article
- Evolutionary Diversification and Adaptive Evolution Analysis of the Plant HD-Zip IV Subfamily.Genes · 2025Article
- Bioinformatics Approaches for Understanding the Binding Affinity of Protein-Nucleic Acid Complexes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Virtual Screening and Validation of Affinity DNA Functional Ligands for IgG Fc Segment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Reliable method for predicting the binding affinity of RNA-small molecule interactions using machine learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- A Machine Learning Method to Identify Umami Peptide Sequences by Using Multiplicative LSTM Embedded Features.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Protein-DNA interactions play an important role in various biological processes such as gene expression, replication, and transcription. Understanding the important features that dictate the binding affinity of protein-DNA complexes and predicting their affinities is important for elucidating their recognition mechanisms. In this work, we have collected the experimental binding free energy (ΔG) for a set of 391 Protein-DNA complexes and derived several structure-based features such as interaction energy, contact potentials, volume and surface area of binding site residues, base step parameters of the DNA and contacts between different types of atoms. Our analysis on relationship between binding affinity and structural features revealed that the important factors mainly depend on the number of DNA strands as well as functional and structural classes of proteins. Specifically, binding site properties such as number of atom contacts between the DNA and protein, volume of protein binding sites and interaction-based features such as interaction energies and contact potentials are important to understand the binding affinity. Further, we developed multiple regression equations for predicting the binding affinity of protein-DNA complexes belonging to different structural and functional classes. Our method showed an average correlation and mean absolute error of 0.78 and 0.98 kcal/mol, respectively, between the experimental and predicted binding affinities on a jack-knife test. We have developed a webserver, PDA-PreD (Protein-DNA Binding affinity predictor), for predicting the affinity of protein-DNA complexes and it is freely available at https://web.iitm.ac.in/bioinfo2/pdapred/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.