Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36924822›Full record

ArticleResuscitation2023

Paucity of neuroprognostic testing after cardiac arrest in the United States.

Jonathan Elmer, Alexis Steinberg, Clifton W Callaway

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07002294 (The Effect of SPecialty cAre on Recovery From Cardiac Arrest Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07002294 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of SPecialty cAre on Recovery From Cardiac Arrest Trial (the SPARC Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2026 to 2032Enrolled1,618ConditionsCardiac Arrest (CA), Heart Arrest, Heart Arrest, Out-Of-HospitalArmsTransfer to specialty care, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan ElmerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: elmerjp@upmc.edu.
Alexis SteinbergDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Clifton W CallawayDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Strategies to Innovate EmeRgENcy Care Clinical Trials Network (SIREN) - Clinical Coordinating Center (CCC)U24NS100659 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WILLIAM G BARSAN, Clifton W. Callaway · 2017 to 2026
$6.4M
Emergency Medicine Research TrainingT32HL134615 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Clifton W. Callaway, DONALD M YEALY · 2017 to 2026
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL134615NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS100659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWithdrawal of life-sustaining therapies for perceived poor neurological prognosis is the most common cause of death for patients hospitalized after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Accurate neuroprognostication is challenging and high stakes, so guidelines recommend multimodality testing. We quantified the frequency and timing with which guideline recommended diagnostics were acquired prior to in-hospital death after cardiac arrest.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study using the Optum® deidentified Electronic Health Record dataset for 2010 to 2021. We included in-hospital decedents admitted after resuscitation from non-traumatic cardiac arrest. We quantified the number of decedents who underwent head computed tomographic imaging, electroencephalography, somatosensory evoked potentials, brain magnetic resonance imaging, or evaluation by a neurologist, as well as the timing of these tests.

resultsOf 34,585 included patients, median age was 66 [interquartile range 53 - 79] years and 13,609 (39%) were female. Median hospital length of stay was 0 days [0-1] days, and only 16% of deaths occurred on or after day three. Only 3,245 patients (9%) had at least one neurodiagnostic test acquired and only 1,708 (5%) were evaluated by a neurologist. The most common neurological diagnostic test to be obtained was CT imaging, acquired in 3,004 (9%) of the overall cohort. Only 852 patients (2%) of patients had at least two diagnostic modalities obtained. DISCUSSION: In this retrospective cohort, we found few patients hospitalized after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest underwent guideline-recommended prognostic testing. If validated in prospective cohorts with more granular clinical information, better guideline adherence and more frequent use of multimodality neuroprognostication offer an opportunity to improve quality of post-arrest care.

Indexed as

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestAgedFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesCardiac arrestOutcomesPrognostication

Identifiers

PMID36924822
PMCPMC10293050
OpenAlexW4324369014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.