ArticleResuscitation2023
Paucity of neuroprognostic testing after cardiac arrest in the United States.
Article in Resuscitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07002294 (The Effect of SPecialty cAre on Recovery From Cardiac Arrest Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of SPecialty cAre on Recovery From Cardiac Arrest Trial (the SPARC Trial)
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case Volume of Targeted Temperature Management and Neurological Outcomes in Comatose Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survivors: Nationwide Population-Based Study.Korean circulation journal · 2026Article
- Ability of a Composite Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score to Predict Neurologic Outcomes in Survivors of Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies after cardiac arrest.Current opinion in critical care · 2025Review
- Estimating bias from withdrawal of life sustaining treatment in clinical trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Challenges with Formulating Accurate Prognosis for Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury.Neurocritical care · 2025Review
- Implementation of a specialized neuroprognostication consultation program and associated provider attitudes: A survey-based study.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Recovery Potential in Patients After Cardiac Arrest Who Die After Limitations or Withdrawal of Life Support.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- The Recovery of Consciousness via Evidence-Based Medicine and Research (RECOVER) Program: A Paradigm for Advancing Neuroprognostication.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2024Article
- Standardised and automated assessment of head computed tomography reliably predicts poor functional outcome after cardiac arrest: a prospective multicentre study.Intensive care medicine · 2024Observational
- Deep learning-enabled detection of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy after cardiac arrest in CT scans: a comparative study of 2D and 3D approaches.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Brain-derived extracellular vesicles as serologic markers of brain injury following cardiac arrest: A pilot feasibility study.Resuscitation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWithdrawal of life-sustaining therapies for perceived poor neurological prognosis is the most common cause of death for patients hospitalized after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Accurate neuroprognostication is challenging and high stakes, so guidelines recommend multimodality testing. We quantified the frequency and timing with which guideline recommended diagnostics were acquired prior to in-hospital death after cardiac arrest.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study using the Optum® deidentified Electronic Health Record dataset for 2010 to 2021. We included in-hospital decedents admitted after resuscitation from non-traumatic cardiac arrest. We quantified the number of decedents who underwent head computed tomographic imaging, electroencephalography, somatosensory evoked potentials, brain magnetic resonance imaging, or evaluation by a neurologist, as well as the timing of these tests.
resultsOf 34,585 included patients, median age was 66 [interquartile range 53 - 79] years and 13,609 (39%) were female. Median hospital length of stay was 0 days [0-1] days, and only 16% of deaths occurred on or after day three. Only 3,245 patients (9%) had at least one neurodiagnostic test acquired and only 1,708 (5%) were evaluated by a neurologist. The most common neurological diagnostic test to be obtained was CT imaging, acquired in 3,004 (9%) of the overall cohort. Only 852 patients (2%) of patients had at least two diagnostic modalities obtained. DISCUSSION: In this retrospective cohort, we found few patients hospitalized after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest underwent guideline-recommended prognostic testing. If validated in prospective cohorts with more granular clinical information, better guideline adherence and more frequent use of multimodality neuroprognostication offer an opportunity to improve quality of post-arrest care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.