ArticleHaematologica2023
Artificial intelligence to empower diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes by multiparametric flow cytometry.
Article in Haematologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Evaluation of Cohort Selection Criteria and Their Impact on Machine Learning Model Performance and Demographic Disparities in COVID-19 Outcomes: Cohort Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence virtual extracellular vesicles (AIVEVs).Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Novel Approaches to the Management of Myelodysplastic Syndromes: The Roles of Artificial Intelligence and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers.Hematology reports · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence reshaping the paradigm of hematologic malignancy diagnosis and treatment: From static assessment to dynamic precision management.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Biomarkers and advances in AML-MRC: from bench to bedside.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for risk assessment and outcome prediction in malignant haematology.British journal of haematology · 2026Review
- [Diagnostic utility of multiparametric flow cytometric immunophenotyping in myelodysplastic neoplasms].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025Review
- Integrating Molecular Alterations with Immunophenotype and Clinical Characteristics in Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Single-Center Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Using Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Myelodysplastic Syndrome Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- [Advancements in artificial intelligence for the precise diagnosis and treatment of hematological malignancies].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-based Myelodysplastic Syndromes Score, 2022 classifications, and the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System: a perfect match.Haematologica · 2025Article
- Integrating AI and ML in Myelodysplastic Syndrome Diagnosis: State-of-the-Art and Future Prospects.Cancers · 2023Review
- The role of flow cytometry in the classification of myeloid disorders.Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Challenging the status flow: how artificial intelligence is advancing diagnosis of myelodysplastic neoplasms.Haematologica · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) might be challenging and relies on the convergence of cytological, cytogenetic, and molecular factors. Multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) helps diagnose MDS, especially when other features do not contribute to the decision-making process, but its usefulness remains underestimated, mostly due to a lack of standardization of cytometers. We present here an innovative model integrating artificial intelligence (AI) with MFC to improve the diagnosis and the classification of MDS. We develop a machine learning model through an elasticnet algorithm directed on a cohort of 191 patients, only based on flow cytometry parameters selected by the Boruta algorithm, to build a simple but reliable prediction score with five parameters. Our AI-assisted MDS prediction score greatly improves the sensitivity of the Ogata score while keeping an excellent specificity validated on an external cohort of 89 patients with an Area Under the Curve of 0.935. This model allows the diagnosis of both high- and low-risk MDS with 91.8% sensitivity and 92.5% specificity. Interestingly, it highlights a progressive evolution of the score from clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) to highrisk MDS, suggesting a linear evolution between these different stages. By significantly decreasing the overall misclassification of 52% for patients with MDS and of 31.3% for those without MDS (P=0.02), our AI-assisted prediction score outperforms the Ogata score and positions itself as a reliable tool to help diagnose MDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.