Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36923688›Full record

ArticleForest policy and economics2022

Projecting U.S. forest management, market, and carbon sequestration responses to a high-impact climate scenario.

Justin S Baker, George Van Houtven, Jennifer Phelan, Gregory Latta, Christopher M Clark, Kemen G Austin, Olakunle E Sodiya, Sara B Ohrel, John Buckley, Lauren E Gentile and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forest policy and economics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Justin S BakerDept. of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, 2800 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607, United States of America.
George Van HoutvenRTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Rd., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States of America.
Jennifer PhelanRTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Rd., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States of America.
Gregory LattaUniversity of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Dr., MS 1139, Moscow, ID 83844-1139, United States of America.
Christopher M ClarkUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, D.C. 20460, United States of America.
Kemen G AustinRTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Rd., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States of America.
Olakunle E SodiyaDept. of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, 2800 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607, United States of America.
Sara B OhrelUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, D.C. 20460, United States of America.
John BuckleyMcCormick Taylor, 509 South Exeter Street, 4th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21202, United States of America.
Lauren E GentileUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, D.C. 20460, United States of America.
Jeremy MartinichUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, D.C. 20460, United States of America.
Environmental Protection Agency · USRTI International · USNorth Carolina State University · USMcCormick (United States) · USUniversity of Idaho · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of climate change on forest ecosystems remains uncertain, with wide variation in potential climate impacts across different radiative forcing scenarios and global circulation models, as well as potential variation in forest productivity impacts across species and regions. This study uses an empirical forest composition model to estimate the impact of climate factors (temperature and precipitation) and other environmental parameters on forest productivity for 94 forest species across the conterminous United States. The composition model is linked to a dynamic optimization model of the U.S. forestry sector to quantify economic impacts of a high warming scenario (Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5) under six alternative climate projections and two socioeconomic scenarios. Results suggest that forest market impacts and consumer impacts could range from relatively large losses (-$2.6 billion) to moderate gain ($0.2 billion) per year across climate scenarios. Temperature-induced higher mortality and lower productivity for some forest types and scenarios, coupled with increasing economic demands for forest products, result in forest inventory losses by end of century relative to the current climate baseline (3%-23%). Lower inventories and reduced carbon sequestration capacity result in additional economic losses of up to approximately $4.1 billion per year. However, our results also highlight important adaptation mechanisms, such forest type changes and shifts in regional mill capacity that could reduce the impact of high impact climate scenarios.

Indexed as

Climate change adaptationForest managementForest productivityMill capacity

Identifiers

PMID36923688
PMCPMC10013705
OpenAlexW4313479360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.