Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36923602›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2023

Modeling contrast-to-noise ratio from list mode reconstructions of

Michael Silosky, Fuyong Xing, John Wehrend, Daniel V Litwiller, Scott D Metzler, Bennett B Chin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael SiloskyDepartment of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO, USA.
Fuyong XingDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO, USA.
John WehrendDepartment of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO, USA.
Daniel V LitwillerGE Healthcare Denver, CO, USA.
Scott D MetzlerDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bennett B ChinDepartment of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep learning (DL) algorithms have shown promise in identifying and quantifying lesions in PET/CT. However, the accuracy and generalizability of these algorithms relies on large, diverse datasets which are time and labor intensive to curate. Modern PET/CT scanners may acquire data in list mode, allowing for multiple reconstructions of the same datasets with different parameters and imaging times. These reconstructions may provide a wide range of image characteristics to increase the size and diversity of datasets. Training algorithms with shorter imaging times and higher noise properties requires that lesions remain detectable. The purpose of this study is to model and predict the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for shorter imaging times based on CNR from longer duration, lower noise images for

methods

resultsCNR plotted as a function of imaging time for a subset of identified subjects was very well fit with a quadratic model. For the remaining subjects, the measured CNR showed a very high linear correlation with the predicted CNR for these lesions (R

conclusionsCNR for shorter DOTATATE PET imaging times may be accurately predicted using list mode reconstructions of longer acquisitions. A threshold CNR may be applied to longer duration images to ensure lesion detectability of shorter duration reconstructions. This method can aid in the selection of lesions to include in novel data augmentation techniques for deep learning.

Indexed as

68Ga DOTATATEartificial intelligencecontrast-to-noisedetectabilityPET/CT

Identifiers

PMID36923602
PMCPMC10009466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.