Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36923598›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2023

The diagnostic value of the computed tomography scan and ultrasonography in acute appendicitis.

Mahshid Bahrami, Hannaneh Mirgaloyebayat, Zahra Mohajeri, Hossein Mohammadi, Samira Amin Afshari, Pooya Fazeli, Dorna Masaeli, Sayed Mohammad Amin Nourian

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mahshid BahramiAssistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan, Iran.
Hannaneh MirgaloyebayatDepartment of Radiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan, Iran.
Zahra MohajeriMedical Doctor, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan, Iran.
Hossein MohammadiSchool of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan, Iran.
Samira Amin AfshariSchool of Medicine, Yazd University of Medical Sciences Yazd, Iran.
Pooya FazeliSchool of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan, Iran.
Dorna MasaeliSchool of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan, Iran.
Sayed Mohammad Amin NourianCollege of Medicine, Florida International University-FIU/AUA Miami, FL 33199, USA.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRFlorida International University · USYazd University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most prevalent cause of emergency abdominal surgery is acute appendicitis. Ultrasonography is safe and widely available, although it's operator-dependent and difficult for people with massive bodies. Computed tomography (CT) scans are more accurate than ultrasonography, with a 93 to 98% accuracy rate. The goal of this investigation is to evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasonography and CT scanning for acute appendicitis. This is a cross-sectional study that was performed on 231 patients with suspected with acute appendicitis. The Alvarado score was initially used to diagnose acute appendicitis. A radiologist performed abdominal ultrasonography on all patients. If the results of the ultrasonography were negative or unclear, a CT scan was performed using oral contrast. Finally, all ultrasonography and CT scan data were reevaluated by an experienced radiologist and compared to the patient's final diagnosis in the case of surgery and pathology results. Comparisons between the two groups were performed. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of ultrasonography according to pathology results in patients with low clinical suspicion were 74.9%, 63.4%, 94.3%, and 67.6%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of CT scans based on pathology results were 87.9%, 81.8%, 94.7%, and 79.3%, respectively, in patients with low clinical suspicion. The CT scan results in female patients suspected of appendicitis were completely consistent with the pathology results. The CT scan demonstrated greater specificity and sensitivity in diagnosing acute appendicitis compared to abdominal ultrasonography.

Indexed as

Acute appendicitiscomputed tomographyultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID36923598
PMCPMC10009470
OpenAlexW4327675382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.