Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36923571›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2023

AV-101, a novel inhaled dry-powder formulation of imatinib, in healthy adult participants: a phase 1 single and multiple ascending dose study.

Hunter Gillies, Ralph Niven, Benjamin T Dake, Murali M Chakinala, Jeremy P Feldman, Nicholas S Hill, Marius M Hoeper, Marc Humbert, Vallerie V McLaughlin, Martin Kankam

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05036135 (IMPAHCT), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05036135 phase2 / phase3terminatednot on this map

IMPAHCT: A Phase 2b/3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 24-Week Dose Ranging and Confirmatory Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of AV-101 in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAerovate TherapeuticsRan2021 to 2024Enrolled202ConditionsPulmonary Arterial HypertensionArmsAV-101, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Pulmonary Hypertension in Women.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Hunter GilliesAerovate Therapeutics, Waltham, MA, USA.
Ralph NivenAerovate Therapeutics, Waltham, MA, USA.
Benjamin T DakeAerovate Therapeutics, Waltham, MA, USA.
Murali M ChakinalaWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Jeremy P FeldmanArizona Pulmonary Specialists, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Nicholas S HillPulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Division, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Marius M HoeperRespiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School and German Centre of Lung Research, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9086-2293
Marc HumbertUniversité Paris-Saclay, INSERM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Pneumologie et Soins Intensifs Respiratoires, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0703-2892
Vallerie V McLaughlinUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Martin KankamAltasciences Clinical Kansas, Inc., Overland Park, KS, USA.
Altasciences Clinical Research Vince & Associates · USArizona Pain Specialists · USInserm · FRMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DETufts Medical Center · USUniversity of Michigan · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oral imatinib has been shown to be effective, but poorly tolerated, in patients with advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). To maintain efficacy while improving tolerability, AV-101, a dry powder inhaled formulation of imatinib, was developed to deliver imatinib directly to the lungs. Methods: This phase 1, placebo-controlled, randomised single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD) study evaluated the safety/tolerability and pharmacokinetics of AV-101 in healthy adults. The SAD study included five AV-101 cohorts (1 mg, 3 mg, 10 mg, 30 mg, 90 mg) and placebo, and a single-dose oral imatinib 400-mg cohort. The MAD study included three AV-101 cohorts (10 mg, 30 mg, 90 mg) and placebo; dosing occurred twice daily for 7 days. Results: 82 participants (SAD n=48, MAD n=34) were enrolled. For the SAD study, peak plasma concentrations of imatinib occurred within 3 h of dosing with lower systemic exposure compared to oral imatinib (p<0.001). For the MAD study, systemic exposure of imatinib was higher after multiple doses of AV-101 compared to a single dose, but steady-state plasma concentrations were lower for the highest AV-101 cohort (90 mg) compared to simulated steady-state oral imatinib at day 7 (p=0.0002). Across AV-101 MAD dose cohorts, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were cough (n=7, 27%) and headache (n=4, 15%). Conclusions: AV-101 was well tolerated in healthy adults, and targeted doses of AV-101 significantly reduced the systemic exposure of imatinib compared with oral imatinib. An ongoing phase 2b/phase 3 study (IMPAHCT; clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05036135) will evaluate the safety/tolerability and clinical benefit of AV-101 for PAH.

Identifiers

PMID36923571
PMCPMC10009698
OpenAlexW4308708678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.