ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Hereditary predisposition to malignant myeloid hemopathies: Caution in use of saliva and guideline based on our experience.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetic predisposition to myelodysplastic syndrome: Genetic counseling and transplant implications.Seminars in hematology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Predisposition to myeloid malignancies is a field at the border of hematology and genetics. Knowledge in this domain has so rapidly increased that WHO defined in 2016 the new "Myeloid Neoplasms with Germline Predisposition" category of tumors. High throughput sequencing is frequently performed in tumors either for diagnosis or prognosis, but this approach may identify potential germline variants that have to be confirmed on non-infiltrated tissues. Method: In this study, we systematically compared NGS data from genetic analysis performed on all sample types (bone marrow, blood, saliva, skin fibroblasts and hair follicles) in 29 patients, and 44 of their relatives (blood and saliva). Results: We showed that saliva was usable for relatives, but only for 24% (7/29) of our patients. Most of patients' saliva were either "non-contributive" (14/29 Conclusion: The recommendations for the use of saliva we present here focus on the importance of collecting saliva during remission when possible. Moreover, we propose hair follicles as an alternative to skin biopsy, that remains the gold standard especially in case of allogenic hematopoietic stem cells transplantation. Technological progresses have revolutionized the diagnosis of predisposition to solid or hematological malignancies, and it is very likely that new techniques will help to manage the familial predisposition in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.