Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36923427›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Hepatectomy versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for resectable BCLC stage A/B hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria: A randomized clinical trial.

Chongkai Fang, Rui Luo, Ying Zhang, Jinan Wang, Kunliang Feng, Silin Liu, Chuyao Chen, Ruiwei Yao, Hanqian Shi, Chong Zhong

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chongkai FangThe First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Rui LuoThe First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Ying ZhangThe First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jinan WangThe First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Kunliang FengThe First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Silin LiuThe First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Chuyao ChenThe First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Ruiwei YaoThe First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Hanqian ShiThe First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Chong ZhongThe First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hepatectomy is the recommended option for radical treatment of BCLC stage A/B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that has progressed beyond the Milan criteria. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of preoperative neoadjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for these patients. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, open-label clinical study, BCLC stage A/B HCC patients beyond the Milan criteria were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either neoadjuvant TACE prior to hepatectomy (NT group) or hepatectomy alone (OP group). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), while the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs). Results: Of 249 patients screened, 164 meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to either the NT group (n = 82) or OP group (n = 82) and completed follow-up requirements. Overall survival was significantly greater in the NT group compared to the OP group at 1 year (97.2% vs. 82.4%), two years (88.4% vs. 60.4%), and three years (71.6% vs. 45.7%) (p = 0.0011) post-treatment. Similarly, PFS was significantly longer in the NT group than the OP group at 1 year (60.1% vs. 39.9%), 2 years (53.4% vs. 24.5%), and 3 years (42.2% vs. 24.5%) (p = 0.0003). No patients reported adverse events of grade 3 or above in either group. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant TACE prolongs the survival of BCLC stage A/B HCC patients beyond the Milan criteria without increasing severe adverse events frequency. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2200055618.

Indexed as

hepatectomyhepatocellular carcinomaMilan criterianeoadjuvant treatmentsurvivaltranscatheter arterial chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID36923427
PMCPMC10010190
OpenAlexW4322493712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read113
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.