Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36923394›Full record

ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2022

Fostering research integrity in sub-Saharan Africa: challenges, opportunities, and recommendations.

Luchuo Engelbert Bain, Larissa Ange Tchuisseu-Kwangoua, Oluwafemi Adeagbo, Ngwayu Claude Nkfusai, Hubert Amu, Farrukh Ishaque Saah, Francis Kombe

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Plagiarism in Publications: All about Being Fair!The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luchuo Engelbert BainDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Larissa Ange Tchuisseu-KwangouaFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Oluwafemi AdeagboDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of lowa, lowa, United States.
Ngwayu Claude NkfusaiMalaria Consortium, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Hubert AmuDepartment of Population and Behavioural Sciences, Fred N. Binka School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana.
Farrukh Ishaque SaahDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Fred N. Binka School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana.
Francis KombeAfrican Research Integrity Network, Durban, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrity and adherence to appropriate ethical standards are important elements of research. These standards are key to protecting research participants´ rights as well as ensuring the reliability and quality of research outputs. Although empirical evidence is scanty, several authors have alluded to the fact that violation of research integrity standards could be common in low- and middle-income countries including sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Understanding the issues, challenges, and opportunities of research integrity and ethics in SSA is key to promoting the responsible conduct of research and the protection of research participants. This paper presents the authors´ critical views and recommendations on the current state of research integrity in SSA. We argue that understanding the current research integrity architecture in SSA has the potential to identify opportunities to promote responsible conduct of research in SSA. Such opportunities include, but are not limited to transparency, accountability, and reproducibility of research, which collectively lead to enhanced public trust in the research enterprise. We highlight the need to embrace equity, fairness, diversity, and inclusivity in the research cycle from conception (priority setting), funding, implementation, dissemination of findings, and scale up. We move on to provide a rationale for understanding the differences and similarities between research ethics and research integrity. Governments, research, and academic institutions must develop multifaceted approaches to promote compliance with principles of research integrity by developing and implementing clear research integrity policies and guidelines that foster responsible conduct of research and prioritize capacity building and empowerment of early career researchers, students, and other targeted key stakeholders.

Indexed as

Ethics, ResearchResearch PersonnelAfrica South of the SaharaHumansReproducibility of ResultsUniversitiesethicsintegrityResearch misconductsub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID36923394
PMCPMC10008683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read20
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.