Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36923375›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2023

Vacuum-stent: A combination of endoscopic vacuum therapy and an intraluminal stent for treatment of esophageal transmural defects.

Lisanne M D Pattynama, Wietse J Eshuis, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen, Jacques J G H M Bergman, Roos E Pouw

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Boerhaave Syndrome-Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Endoscopic vacuum therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lisanne M D PattynamaDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Wietse J EshuisDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Mark I van Berge HenegouwenDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jacques J G H M BergmanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Roos E PouwCancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLCancer Center AmsterdamUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has gained a greater role in management of transmural defects in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, including anastomotic leakage and esophageal perforation (e.g. Boerhaave syndrome and iatrogenic causes). The vacuum-stent is a new treatment modality, combining the benefits of EVT and an intraluminal stent. Patients and methods: This prospective case series describes the first ten cases of a transmural defect in the upper GI tract treated with a vacuum-stent in a tertiary referral center. All patients signed informed consent for prospective registration of relevant data on treatment and outcomes in a specially designed database. Outcome parameters were successful closure of the defect, number of endoscopies, duration of treatment and adverse events. Results: In total, ten patients treated with a vacuum-stent were included. Eight patients had anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection, of whom six were treated with vacuum-sponge and vacuum-stent, and two with vacuum-stent only. One patient had Boerhaave syndrome, treated with vacuum-sponge and vacuum-stent, and one had an iatrogenic perforation during pneumodilation for achalasia, treated with vacuum-stent only. Success rate was 100%, requiring a median of 5 (IQR 3-12) EVT-related endoscopies with a treatment course of median 18 (IQR 12-59) days. One patient developed an esophageal stricture, but no other vacuum-stent related adverse events were observed. Conclusion: The vacuum-stent, which combines benefits of EVT and an intraluminal stent, shows great feasibility and efficacy in treatment of transmural defects in the upper GI tract. Future studies should point out whether this device can prevent major (re-)surgery in these patients.

Indexed as

anastomotic leakageendoscopic vacuum therapyesophagusperforationVACStent

Identifiers

PMID36923375
PMCPMC10010284
OpenAlexW4321496676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read12
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.