ArticleHealth science reports2023
An economic impact of incorrect referrals for MRI and CT scans: A retrospective analysis.
Article in Health science reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oxford Hip and Shoulder Scores as Potential Tools for the Early Detection of Avascular Necrosis in Apparently Unaffected Sites in Sickle Cell Disease: Results from a Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Applications and Safety Considerations: 2024 Update.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025Review
- Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging Overused Among Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty?Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024Article
- Deep learning approach to femoral AVN detection in digital radiography: differentiating patients and pre-collapse stages.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- An economic impact of incorrect referrals for MRI and CT scans: A retrospective analysis.Health science reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Up to date, no research on the economic efficacy of diagnostic modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computerized tomography (CT), has been done in Central Asia. The aim of this study was to analyse the inappropriate appointments of MRI and CT scanning procedures in Kazakhstan. Methods: We used the imaging diagnostic reports and medical records from 9725 planned outpatient CT and MRI exams performed in two major hospitals in Almaty. The study period was for the period 2014-2019. The independent experts-radiologists evaluated the MRI and CT exams for validity using the ACR® compliance standards and RCR recommendations. Results: The results showed that the combined costs of MRI and CT scans increased by $17.982 between 2014 ($22.537) and 2019 ($40.519), Conclusion: The findings indicated an increase in the number of referrals for unnecessary CT and MRI tests over the research period (2014-2019). It had a substantial impact on the rise in healthcare system expenses. The results demonstrate the need for the education of GPs and improving the approaches for diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.