ArticleCureus2023
Psychometric Features of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale Among Malaysian Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a 10-item questionnaire developed to identify women at risk for postpartum depression (PD). EPDS symptom patterns appear to vary by nation. The EPDS items and their correlation with affirmative EPDS screens have thus far been minimally studied among Malaysians. Using positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), this study aims to evaluate the EPDS-based psychometric features of individual answer items. Methodology A cross-section of postpartum women receiving care at two tertiary care facilities in Malaysia underwent screening assessments in the course of receiving treatment. EPDS was employed with an aggregate cutoff score (≥12). EPDS items were assessed as predictors of abnormal EPDS screens. Results A total of 219 participants were screened, among which 66 were positive on the EPDS. EPDS item responses were collected (item responses 0-3: PPV = 0.07-0.78 and NPV = 0.93-0.22). A negative response to any item strongly predicted a negative EPDS screen (item entry = 0 and NPV = 0.93). Affirmative responses on items 8, 9, and 10 were particularly strong predictors of abnormal EPDS scores, while negative responses to items 3, 5, and 7 were strong predictors of negative EPDS scores. A substantial NPV for any item (response 0 and NPV items 1-10 = 0.93) and a moderate PPV for any affirmative response (responses 1-3, PPV items 1-10 = 0.60) were observed. Conclusions This is one of the few studies to examine the EPDS item responses among Malaysian women. The results suggest that depression remains prevalent in this postpartum population. Our findings reveal a robust NPV for any negative response to the individual items of the scale, a moderate PPV for any affirmative response, and a particularly robust validity for specific EPDS items. Physical complaints, rather than feelings of sadness, figure prominently in this population, suggesting a tendency among Malaysian women toward somatization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.