Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36923057›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty today2023

Penalty for Switching Implants? Assessing the Learning Curve With a Collarless, Tapered Wedge Cementless Femoral Component.

Brian T Muffly, Jude C Kluemper, Cale A Jacobs, David C Landy, Stephen T Duncan

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty today, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian T MufflyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Jude C KluemperDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Cale A JacobsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
David C LandyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Stephen T DuncanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgeon learning curve associated with a tapered wedge femoral implant as measured by early femoral component subsidence and 90-day risk of reoperation was evaluated. Methods: The first 451 patients undergoing primary, cementless total hip arthroplasty by a single, fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeon with a tapered wedge stem design were retrospectively reviewed. Early radiographic femoral component subsidence during the first 6 weeks postoperatively and 90-day reoperations was recorded. Results: When stratified by approach, there was no association between date of surgery and femoral component subsidence in the posterior approach ( Conclusions: In a single surgeon's initial use of a tapered cementless wedge stem, early femoral component subsidence was not impacted by the surgeon's learning curve when the posterior approach was utilized. Although subsidence was associated with date of surgery in the direct anterior cohort, this was not associated with increased risk of 90-day reoperation. Should a surgeon adopt a new tapered-wedge stem, these findings suggest that the stem is forgiving both in relation to subsidence and 90-day reoperation risk when appropriate surgical technique is utilized.

Indexed as

Learning curveRevision riskSubsidenceTapered wedge stemTHA

Identifiers

PMID36923057
PMCPMC10009679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read4
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.