Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36923049›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Psychosocial outcomes and peer influences among multiracial adolescents in the United States.

Stephanie A Grilo, John S Santelli, Constance Nathanson, Marina Catallozzi, Ana F Abraido-Lanza, Sarah Adelman, Diana Hernández

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephanie A GriloMailman School of Public Health, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.
John S SantelliMailman School of Public Health, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.
Constance NathansonMailman School of Public Health, Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.
Marina CatallozziMailman School of Public Health, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.
Ana F Abraido-LanzaSchool of Social Work, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.
Sarah AdelmanMailman School of Public Health, Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.
Diana HernándezMailman School of Public Health, Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine racial and ethnic self-identification among adolescents and explore psychosocial outcomes and peer treatment for multiracial adolescents in the United States. Methods: Data are from the 2014 Child Development Supplement, a subsample of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Data were weighted to be nationally representative. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the population and to explore family and parent demographics. Multivariable regressions tested for differences in psychosocial outcomes and peer treatment and group behaviors for multiracial youth in comparison to their single race peers. Results: Black multiracial youth had significantly lower scores on the children's depression index compared to single race Black youth, and White multiracial youth reported significantly higher rates of peer mistreatment in comparison to White single race youth. Black multiracial and White multiracial adolescents reported similar positive and negative peer group behaviors. Conclusions: Complex patterns emerge when examining the psychosocial and peer treatment variables presented in this analysis for multiracial adolescents and their single-race peers. The findings regarding depressive symptoms and peer bullying point to signs of different relationships between multiracial groups. White multiracial adolescents report worse outcomes than their White single-race peers, but Black multiracial adolescents reporting better outcomes than their Black single-race peers.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorPeer InfluenceRacial GroupsAdolescentBlack or African AmericanChildHumansPeer GroupUnited StatesWhiteadolescentsdisparitiesmultiracialpeer influencepsychosocial

Identifiers

PMID36923049
PMCPMC10008866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read133
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.