Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36923041›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Using planned behavior theory to understand cervical cancer screening intentions in Chinese women.

Tingting Xin, Yuting Jiang, Chunting Li, Xian Ding, Zhu Zhu, Xiao Chen

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tingting XinSchool of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
Yuting JiangSchool of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
Chunting LiSchool of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
Xian DingDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
Zhu ZhuDepartment of Cardiology, Wuxi Second People's Hospital, Wuxi, China.
Xiao ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical cancer is still one of the cancers threatening the health of Chinese women with high morbidity and mortality. However, the participation rate of cervical cancer screening (CCS) among women is low due to various reasons, so it is crucial to understand the factors that influence women's willingness to be screened for cervical cancer. This study's goal was to understand the intention of cervical cancer screening in Chinese women using the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Methods: An online questionnaire was administered to 286 women using a cross-sectional design. The questionnaire was created using the theory of planned behavior and included demographic characteristics as well as the basic structure of TPB. Results: Descriptive, correlation, and multiple linear regression models were performed to identify factors associated with cervical cancer screening behavior. 286 respondents completed the survey (95.3%). The mean scores for behavioral attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioral control (PBC) were 32.50 (SD = 3.30), 22.59 (SD = 2.80) and 29.57 (SD = 3.37). From the regression analysis, behavioral attitude (B = 0.110, Discussion: This study provided a reference for improving the intention of cervical cancer screening in women.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansIntentionTheory of Planned Behaviorbehaviorcervical cancer screeningintentionplanned behavior theorywomen

Identifiers

PMID36923041
PMCPMC10008845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read39
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.