ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023
LFP polarity changes across cortical and eccentricity in primary visual cortex.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Local field potentials (LFPs) can evaluate neural population activity in the cortex and their interaction with other cortical areas. Analyzing current source density (CSD) rather than LFPs is very significant due to the reduction of volume conduction effects. Current sinks are construed as net inward transmembrane currents, while current sources are net outward ones. Despite extensive studies of LFPs and CSDs, their morphology in different cortical layers and eccentricities are still largely unknown. Because LFP polarity changes provide a measure of neural activity, they can be useful in implanting brain-computer interface (BCI) chips and effectively communicating the BCI devices to the brain. We hypothesize that sinks and sources analyses could be a way to quantitatively achieve their characteristics in response to changes in stimulus size and layer-dependent differences with increasing eccentricities. In this study, we show that stimulus properties play a crucial role in determining the flow. The present work focusses on the primary visual cortex (V1). In this study, we investigate a map of the LFP-CSD in V1 area by presenting different stimulus properties (e.g., size and type) in the visual field area of Macaque monkeys. Our aim is to use the morphology of sinks and sources to measure the input and output information in different layers as well as different eccentricities. According to the value of CSDs, the results show that the stimuli smaller than RF's size had lower strength than the others and the larger RF's stimulus size showed smaller strength than the optimized stimulus size, which indicated the suppression phenomenon. Additionally, with the increased eccentricity, CSD's strengths were increased across cortical layers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.