Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36922783›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Preparing allied health students for placement: a contrast of learning modalities for foundational skill development.

Laura Rossiter, Ruth Turk, Belinda Judd, Jennie Brentnall, Chloe Grimmett, Emma Cowley, Keith McCormick, Deborah Thackray

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Restrictions: Follow-Up on Changes Within Canadian Academic and Fieldwork Curricula.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura RossiterSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom. l.rossiter@soton.ac.uk.
Ruth TurkSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Belinda JuddFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Jennie BrentnallFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Chloe GrimmettSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Emma CowleySchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Keith McCormickSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Deborah ThackraySchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Funding

Health Education England No Grant ID given
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith increasing pressure on placement capacity for allied health students, a need for novel and creative means through which students can develop foundational skills and prepare for practice-based learning opportunities has arisen. This study aimed to explore the experiences of domestic and international first-year students completing pre-clinical preparation programs, contrasting between in-person simulation and online options to contribute to best practice evidence for program design and delivery.

methodsFirst-year students from physiotherapy, podiatry and occupational therapy self-selected to either a one-weeklong in-person simulation program or an online preparation for placement program. An integrative mixed-methods approach was employed. Qualitative findings from student focus groups were analyzed by reflexive thematic analysis and complemented by quantitative pre-post questionnaires which were examined for patterns of findings.

resultsThere were 53 student participants in the study (simulation n = 29; online n = 24). Self-selecting, international students disproportionately opted for the simulation program while older students disproportionately selected the online program. Students appeared to benefit more from the simulation program than the online program, with alignment of focus group findings to the quantitative questionnaire data. The in-person simulation allowed students to apply their learning and practice patient communication. All simulation students reported asubsequent increase in confidence, although this seemed particularly marked for the international students. By contrast, the online program was most effective at developing students' clinical reasoning and proficiency with documentation. Both programs faced minor challenges to student perceived relevance and skill development.

conclusionBoth online and in-person simulation preparation programs were perceived to enhance readiness and foundational skills development for novice allied health students, with the practical nature of simulation generating more advantageous findings. This study provides useful information on the benefits and challenges of both types of delivery for foundational skills development and/or clinical preparation of allied health students.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceOccupational TherapyCommunicationHumansLearningStudentsAllied health studentsClinical placementOccupational therapyOnline learningPhysiotherapyPodiatrySimulation-based education

Identifiers

PMID36922783
PMCPMC10018923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read24
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.