ArticleScientific reports2023
Relationship between electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and behavioral T-levels in implanted children with cochlear nerve deficiency.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is the Presence of eCAP Intraoperatively a Predictor of Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Adults?International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2026Article
- Electrical Stapedial Reflex Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Cochlear Nerve Deficiency: A Retrospective Study.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2025Article
- Age effect on inter-pulse interval selection for ECAP measurement.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- A new method for removing artifacts from recordings of the electrically evoked compound action potential: Single-pulse stimulation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Preliminary evaluation of the FastCAP for users of the Nurotron cochlear implant.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is challenging to program children with cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) due to limited auditory and speech abilities or concurrent neurological deficits. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds have been widely used by many audiologists to help cochlear implant programming for children who cannot cooperate with behavioral testing. However, the relationship between ECAP thresholds and behavioral levels of cochlear nerve in children with CND remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate how well ECAP thresholds are related to behavioral thresholds in the MAP for children with CND. This study included 29 children with CND who underwent cochlear implantation. For each participant, ECAP thresholds and behavioral T-levels were measured at three electrode locations across the electrode array post-activation. The relationship between ECAP thresholds and behavioral T-levels was analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. The results showed that ECAP thresholds were significantly correlated with behavioral T-levels at the basal, middle, and apical electrodes. ECAP thresholds were equal to or higher than the behavioral T-levels for all tested electrodes, and fell within MAP's dynamic range for approximately 90% of the tested electrodes. Moreover, the contour of the ECAP thresholds was similar to the contour of T-levels across electrodes for most participants. ECAP thresholds can help audiologists select stimulation levels more efficiently for children with CND who cannot provide sufficient behavioral response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.