Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36922551›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Genetic analysis of allogenic donor cells after successful allo-limbal epithelial transplantation in simple and cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation procedures.

Suksri Chotikavanich, Nitikorn Poriswanish, Angkoon Luangaram, Parwana Numnoi, Ranida Thamphithak, Warinyupa Pinitpuwadol, Mongkol Uiprasertkul, Chareenun Chirapapaisan, Rosanun Sikarinkul, Pinnita Prabhasawat

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Utilization of Stem Cells in Medicine: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suksri ChotikavanichDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nitikorn PoriswanishDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. nitikorn.por@mahidol.ac.th.ORCID 0000-0002-2173-0008
Angkoon LuangaramDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Parwana NumnoiDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2428-9289
Ranida ThamphithakDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Warinyupa PinitpuwadolDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mongkol UiprasertkulDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chareenun ChirapapaisanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rosanun SikarinkulDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pinnita PrabhasawatDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Siriraj Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This non-comparative cohort study investigated long-term donor cell survival after allogenic simple/cultivated limbal epithelial transplantations (allo-SLET/allo-CLET, respectively) by genetic analysis. Transplanted corneal epithelial cells, which underwent impression cytology and/or corneal-button biopsy, were examined for personal identities of autosomal short-tandem repeats; the percentages of donor cells were calculated based on matching recipient or donor buccal-DNA references. Twelve patients were included; 4 underwent allo-CLET, 8 underwent allo-SLET. Eight patients (67%) had total limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). Genetic analysis was performed postoperatively (mean, 55.3 months). Donor cells were detected in 4 of 12 patients (25%), all of whom underwent allo-SLET; 1 patient had a donor genotype and 3 patients had a mixed donor/recipient genotype. The longest time of donor cell detection was 30 months. Seven patients (58%) used systemic immunosuppressives at the time of genetic analysis (mean use, 22.5 months). Allogenic donor cells survived in both procedures for the long term postoperatively, which encourages the long-term use of systemic immunosuppressives. Donor cells may not be the only factor in graft survival, in that most successful cases had a recipient profile. Their presence for a specific time may promote niches for the patients' own cells to repopulate, especially for partial LSCD.

Indexed as

Corneal DiseasesEpithelium, CornealLimbal Stem Cell DeficiencyLimbus CorneaeCohort StudiesEpithelial CellsHumansStem Cell TransplantationTissue DonorsTransplantation, Autologous

Identifiers

PMID36922551
PMCPMC10017711
OpenAlexW4327676744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read51
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.