Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36922492›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Heterologous SARS-CoV-2 spike protein booster elicits durable and broad antibody responses against the receptor-binding domain.

Tomohiro Takano, Takashi Sato, Ryutaro Kotaki, Saya Moriyama, Shuetsu Fukushi, Masahiro Shinoda, Kiyomi Kabasawa, Nagashige Shimada, Mio Kousaka, Yu Adachi and 6 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tomohiro Takano *Research Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4267-1147
Takashi Sato *Tokyo Shinagawa Hospital, Tokyo, 140-8522, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2676-3781
Ryutaro Kotaki *Research Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7965-1671
Saya MoriyamaResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Shuetsu FukushiDepartment of Virology I, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Masahiro ShinodaTokyo Shinagawa Hospital, Tokyo, 140-8522, Japan.
Kiyomi KabasawaTokyo Shinagawa Hospital, Tokyo, 140-8522, Japan.
Nagashige ShimadaTokyo Shinagawa Hospital, Tokyo, 140-8522, Japan.
Mio KousakaTokyo Shinagawa Hospital, Tokyo, 140-8522, Japan.
Yu AdachiResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Taishi OnoderaResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Kazutaka TeraharaResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Masanori IsogawaResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Takayuki MatsumuraResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan. matt@niid.go.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-1760-3484
Masaharu ShinkaiTokyo Shinagawa Hospital, Tokyo, 140-8522, Japan. shinkai050169@gmail.com.
Yoshimasa TakahashiResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan. ytakahas@niid.go.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-6342-4087
National Institute of Infectious Diseases · JPNew Tokyo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immunogenicity of mRNA vaccines has not been well studied when compared to different vaccine modalities in the context of additional boosters. Here we show that longitudinal analysis reveals more sustained SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD)-binding IgG titers with the breadth to antigenically distinct variants by the S-268019-b spike protein booster compared to the BNT162b2 mRNA homologous booster. The durability and breadth of RBD-angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) binding inhibitory antibodies are pronounced in the group without systemic adverse events (AEs) after the S-268019-b booster, leading to the elevated neutralizing activities against Omicron BA.1 and BA.5 variants in the stratified group. In contrast, BNT162b2 homologous booster elicited antibodies to spike N-terminal domain in proportion to the AE scores. High-dimensional immune profiling identifies early CD16

Indexed as

Antibody FormationCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineHumansImmunization, SecondaryImmunoglobulin GSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccines, SubunitAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GS-268019-b COVID-19 vaccineSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Vaccines, Subunit

Identifiers

PMID36922492
PMCPMC10016167
OpenAlexW4327681657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read45
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.