Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36922372›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2023

Long-term follow-up of persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules: Natural course of pure, heterogeneous, and real part-solid ground-glass nodules.

Zhedong Zhang, Lixin Zhou, Xianjun Min, Hao Li, Qingyi Qi, Chao Sun, Kunkun Sun, Fan Yang, Xiao Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhedong ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6845-5835
Lixin ZhouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xianjun MinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, AMHT Group Aerospace 731 Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hao LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9426-9446
Qingyi QiDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chao SunDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Kunkun SunDepartment of Pathology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Fan YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiao LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Peking University · CNBeijing Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have suggested the applicability of three classifications of subsolid nodules (SSNs). However, few studies have unraveled the natural history of the three types of SSNs.

methodsA retrospective study from two medical centers between November 2007 and November 2017 was conducted to explore the long-term follow-up results of three different types of SSNs, which were divided into pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs), heterogeneous ground-glass nodules (hGGNs), and real part-solid nodules (rPSNs).

resultsA total of 306 consecutive patients, including 361 SSNs with long-term follow-up, were reviewed. The median growth times of pGGNs, hGGNs, and rPSNs were 7.7, 6.0, and 2.0 years, respectively. For pGGNs, the median period of development into rPSNs was 4.6 years, while that of hGGNs was 1.8 years, and the time from pGGNs to hGGNs was 3.1 years (p < 0.05). In SSNs with an initial lung window consolidation tumor ratio (LW-CTR) >0.5 and mediastinum window (MW)-CTR >0.2, all cases with growth were identified within 5 years. Meanwhile, in SSNs whose LW-CTR and MW-CTR were 0, it took over 5 years to detect nodular growth. Pathologically, 90.6% of initial SSNs with LW-CTR >0 were invasive carcinomas (invasive adenocarcinoma and micro-invasive adenocarcinoma). Among patients with rPSNs in the initial state, 100.0% of the final pathological results were invasive carcinoma. Cox regression showed that age (p = 0.038), initial maximal diameter (p < 0.001), and LW-CTR (p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for SSN growth.

conclusionspGGNs, hGGNs, and rPSNs have significantly different natural histories. Age, initial nodule diameter, and LW-CTR are important risk factors for SSN growth.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaLung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesPrecancerous ConditionsFollow-Up StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computedheterogenous ground-glass nodules (hGGNs)natural coursepulmonary adenocarcinomasubsolid nodules (SSNs)

Identifiers

PMID36922372
PMCPMC10125786
OpenAlexW4327615369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.