Observational studyBMJ open2023
Effect of general health checks on the treatment of chronic diseases: accounting for self-selection in the retrospective cohort study using Korea National Health Insurance data.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study examines the effect of general health checks on the detection and treatment of diabetes and hypertension with controlling for the self-selection problem of undergoing general health checks.
designRetrospective observational cohort study.
settingSample Research Database offered by Korean National Health Insurance Service, between 2002 and 2013.
participantsTwo datasets, focusing on diabetes and hypertensions one by one, are constructed. The number of participants for the datasets is 133 329 (diabetes) and 101 738 (hypertension), respectively.
methodsA bivariate probit model with selection was adopted to investigate the impact of general health checks on the diagnosis of critical chronic diseases. The dependent variable was an indicator variable denoting whether a participant has been treated for diabetes (or hypertension) or not for the first time during the sample period. An indicator variable that indicates whether that participant is eligible for free general health checks or not in the focal year (year of the first treatment or last year in the sample) was used as instrument variables to control for the self-selection problem of undergoing general health checks.
resultsWe found that there exists substantial self-selection between undergoing general health checks and diagnosis for chronic diseases. The correlations between the unobserved factors influencing the decisions to obtain general health checks and those determining the detection of chronic diseases are highly significant and positive (ie, 0.188 (p<0.001) in diabetes and 0.220 (p<0.001) in hypertension). We confirmed that these positive, significant correlations generate upward bias in the estimated effect of general health checks on the detection and treatment of diabetes (0.312 (p<0.001) when self-selection ignored but 0.099 (p<0.001) when self-selection considered) and hypertension (0.293 (p<0.001) when self-selection ignored but insignificant when self-selection considered). The effect of general health checks and people's self-selection behaviour may differ by socio-economic characteristics of individuals. The general health check is effective in detecting chronic diseases among low-income individuals rather than high-income individuals, implying that general health checks are contributing to helping medically underprivileged low-income people detect and treat their chronic diseases. High-income individuals showed stronger self-selection behaviour than low-income individuals and this may overstate the effect of general health checks if the self-selection is overlooked, particularly among high-income individuals.
conclusionSelf-selection due to unobserved factors between undergoing general health checks and diagnosis of chronic diseases are substantial. After accounting for this, the effect of general health checks on the detection and treatment of diabetes and hypertension is insignificant or marginal. The increases in the treatments of the two diseases following general health checks are 1% and insignificant in diabetes and hypertension, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.