ArticleBMJ open2023
Application of complexity theory in health and social care research: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender-sensitive and diversity-sensitive end-of-life care in Switzerland (GiveCare): a mixed-methods study protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Exploring innovation landscapes: a national cross-sectional study of Swedish primary care from the viewpoint of primary care managers.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Perspectives on the impact of the inclusion of non-medical practitioners in the skill mixed staffing teams of English emergency departments: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Complex intervention to improve empathy within maternity services: a mixed methods feasibility study with pilot evaluation.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Integrating systems thinking and implementation science in biomedical informatics research.JAMIA open · 2026Review
- The Impact of Public Health Interventions on the Frequency and Duration of Hospitalisations Among Seniors in Poland-An Analysis Covering the Years 2017-2018.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A complexity theory-informed COPC approach to evaluation of mining health programmes.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025Article
- Achieving an Intelligent HealthScience System: Aligning science, health, business, policy and technology for patients and society.Learning health systems · 2025Article
- If things were simple, word would have gotten around. Can complexity science help us improve pediatric research?Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Amplifying Community Health Worker Voices to Examine the Implementation and Scaling of a Community Health Program: A Qualitative Study in the Philippines.Health services insights · 2025Article
- The Ripple Framework: Co-Producing Social, Cultural, and Economic Value in Care Through a Generative and Relational Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Emergency infection prevention and control training in fragile, conflict-affected or vulnerable settings: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- 'Atawhai': a primary care provider-led response to family violence in Aotearoa New Zealand.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024Article
- Policy brief: Improving national vaccination decision-making through data.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Once Upon a Time There Was CME, and Then…"Expanding the Voices in CME-CPD".Journal of CME · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplexity theory has been chosen by many authors as a suitable lens through which to examine health and social care. Despite its potential value, many empirical investigations apply the theory in a tokenistic manner without engaging with its underlying concepts and underpinnings.
objectivesThe aim of this scoping review is to synthesise the literature on empirical studies that have centred on the application of complexity theory to understand health and social care provision.
methodsThis scoping review considered primary research using complexity theory-informed approaches, published in English between 2012 and 2021. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, PSYCHINFO, the NHS Economic Evaluation Database, and the Health Economic Evaluations Database were searched. In addition, a manual search of the reference lists of relevant articles was conducted. Data extraction was conducted using Covidence software and a data extraction form was created to produce a descriptive summary of the results, addressing the objectives and research question. The review used the revised Arksey and O'Malley framework and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
results2021 studies were initially identified with a total of 61 articles included for extraction. Complexity theory in health and social care research is poorly defined and described and was most commonly applied as a theoretical and analytical framework. The full breadth of the health and social care continuum was not represented in the identified articles, with the majority being healthcare focused. DISCUSSION: Complexity theory is being increasingly embraced in health and care research. The heterogeneity of the literature regarding the application of complexity theory made synthesis challenging. However, this scoping review has synthesised the most recent evidence and contributes to translational systems research by providing guidance for future studies.
conclusionThe study of complex health and care systems necessitates methods of interpreting dynamic prcesses which requires qualitative and longitudinal studies with abductive reasoning. The authors provide guidance on conducting complexity-informed primary research that seeks to promote rigor and transparency in the area. REGISTRATION: The scoping review protocol was registered at Open Science Framework, and the review protocol was published at BMJ Open (https://bit.ly/3Ex1Inu).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.