Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36921805›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2023

A Decade of Dietary Assessment Methodology Research at the National Institutes of Health, 2012-2021.

Mary E Evans, Kirsten A Herrick, Karen S Regan, Marissa M Shams-White, Ashley J Vargas, Jill Reedy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mary E EvansNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States. Electronic address: evansmary@niddk.nih.gov.
Kirsten A HerrickNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Karen S ReganOffice of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Marissa M Shams-WhiteNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Ashley J VargasEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Jill ReedyNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
National Institutes of Health · USNational Cancer Institute · USNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessment of individual and population-level dietary intake is critical for public health surveillance, epidemiology, and dietary intervention research. In recognition of that need, the National Insitutes of Health (NIH) has a history of funding research projects designed to support the development, implementation, and refinement of tools to assess dietary intake in humans.

objectivesThis report provides data and information on NIH-funded dietary intake assessment methodological research over the period of 2012-2021.

methodsData were extracted from an internal NIH data system using the Research, Condition, and Disease Categorization (RCDC) spending category for Nutrition. Data were then examined to identify research focused on dietary assessment tools or methods to capture or analyze dietary intake.

resultsOver the decade of 2012-2021, NIH supported 46 grants and 2 large contracts specific to dietary assessment methods development. The top 6 Institutes and Offices funding dietary assessment methods research were identified. Most projects were limited to adults. Projects ranged from novel methods to capture dietary intake, and refinement of analytical methods, to biomarkers of dietary intake. One key contract supported the automated self-administered 24-h dietary assessment tool (ASA24), a widely used, free tool available to the research community for assessing dietary intake.

conclusionsNIH's support for dietary assessment methods development over this 10-y period was small but grew over time with an expanding number and variety of methods, data sources, and technological advancements in the assessment of dietary intake. NIH remains committed to supporting research seeking to advance the field of dietary assessment methods research.

Indexed as

National Institutes of Health (U.S.)Nutrition AssessmentAdultDietEatingFinancing, OrganizedHumansUnited Statesdietary assessment researchdietary biomarkerdietary intakedietary monitoring methods nutrient intakefood-specific biomarker

Identifiers

PMID36921805
PMCPMC10196585
OpenAlexW4324144490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.