ArticleBioconjugate chemistry2023
Enzymatic Spin-Labeling of Protein N- and C-Termini for Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.
Article in Bioconjugate chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Segmental Isotope Labeling of the Prion Protein: Identification of a Key Residue for Copper-Mediated Interdomain Structure.ACS chemical biology · 2025Article
- Flavoproteins as native and genetically encoded spin probes for in cell ESR spectroscopy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy is a powerful tool for investigating the structure and dynamics of proteins. The introduction of paramagnetic moieties at specific positions in a protein enables precise measurement of local structure and dynamics. This technique, termed site-directed spin-labeling, has traditionally been performed using cysteine-reactive radical-containing probes. However, large proteins are more likely to contain multiple cysteine residues and cysteine labeling at specific sites may be infeasible or impede function. To address this concern, we applied three peptide-ligating enzymes (sortase, asparaginyl endopeptidase, and inteins) for nitroxide labeling of N- and C-termini of select monomeric and dimeric proteins. Continuous wave and pulsed EPR (double electron electron resonance) experiments reveal specific attachment of nitroxide probes to ether N-termini (OaAEP1) or C-termini (sortase and intein) across three test proteins (CheY, CheA, and iLOV), thereby enabling a straightforward, highly specific, and general method for protein labeling. Importantly, the linker length (3, 5, and 9 residues for OaAEP1, intein, and sortase reactions, respectively) between the probe and the target protein has a large impact on the utility of distance measurements by pulsed EPR, with longer linkers leading to broader distributions. As these methods are only dependent on accessible N- and C-termini, we anticipate application to a wide range of protein targets for biomolecular EPR spectroscopy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.