Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36921207›Full record

SynthesisRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2023

Molecular and serological diagnosis of toxoplasmosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Isa Marianny Ferreira Nascimento Barbosa de Souza, Victor da Silva Siqueira, Isabella da Costa Ribeiro, Laís Silva Pinto Moraes, Débora Pereira Gomes do Prado, Stéfanne Rodrigues Rezende, Webster Leonardo Guimarães da Costa, Hanstter Hallison Alves Rezende

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Serosurvey ofFrontiers in public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Isa Marianny Ferreira Nascimento Barbosa de SouzaUniversidade Federal de Jatai, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Aplicadas à Saúde, Jataí, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3986-0203
Victor da Silva SiqueiraUniversidade Federal de Jatai, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Aplicadas à Saúde, Jataí, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6632-6535
Isabella da Costa RibeiroUniversidade Federal de Jataí, Curso de Biomedicina, Jataí, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8437-7777
Laís Silva Pinto MoraesUniversidade Federal de Jataí, Curso de Biomedicina, Jataí, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9957-6565
Débora Pereira Gomes do PradoUniversidade Federal de Jataí, Curso de Biomedicina, Jataí, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5118-5816
Stéfanne Rodrigues RezendeUniversidade Federal de Jataí, Curso de Biomedicina, Jataí, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0380-0428
Webster Leonardo Guimarães da CostaUniversidade Federal de Jatai, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Aplicadas à Saúde, Jataí, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4289-4295
Hanstter Hallison Alves RezendeUniversidade Federal de Jatai, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Aplicadas à Saúde, Jataí, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5816-1427

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxoplasmosis is an infection of vast worldwide distribution whose etiologic agent is Toxoplasma gondii. This disease can cause problems ranging from mild symptoms to serious conditions, such as encephalitis, miscarriage and blindness. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to perform a diagnosis with reproducible techniques in order to obtain a good prognosis. The aim of this review was to analyze the efficiency of toxoplasmosis diagnostic techniques based on sensitivity and specificity results. Five research platforms in English language were used (Eric, Elsevier, Google Scholar, PubMed and SciELO), which contained data on the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. The search and selection were performed for studies published prior to June 2021. The search resulted in the inclusion of 13 articles published from 2005 to 2020. The data revealed the use of different samples in the standardization of techniques such as serum, total blood, colostrum and amniotic fluid. The flow cytometry, lateral flow immunoassay and qPCR techniques showed 100% sensitivity, whereas the ELISA, western blotting, qPCR and RE-LAMP techniques achieved 100% specificity. Significantly, the qPCR and LAMP techniques were more accurate when the likelihood ratio was assessed. The meta-analysis identified that ISAGA and western blotting have low sensitivity values and LIASON, ELFA and ELISA, using a silica bioconjugate, also have low specificity values. It was noted that a wide range of methods have high values of sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the choice of the method will be based on the conditions and its financial viability.

Indexed as

ToxoplasmaToxoplasmosisAntibodies, ProtozoanEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansImmunoassaySensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID36921207
PMCPMC10013468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.