ArticlePloS one2023
The accuracy of the Stroke Risk Analysis (SRA) system for predicting atrial fibrillation in patients in the postoperative period of myocardial revascularization.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of differences between men and women in short-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Heart rate variability in patients with atrial fibrillation of sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation: chaos or merit?Annals of medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPostoperative myocardial revascularization atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a clinical complication that affects about 30% of patients and its mechanisms of origin are still poorly understood. This fact makes it difficult to identify the patient at greatest risk for this arrhythmia. This mission seems evident due to the complications it entails, including longer hospital stays, risk of stroke, heart failure, and death. There are reports of preoperative clinical aspects inherent to the patient's condition, such as gender and age, and discontinuation of beta-blockers as risk factors. In addition, additional information obtained by electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and blood count data, for example, present only modest predictive results. The analysis of heart rate and heart rate variability obtained by the Stroke Risk Analysis System (SRA) is a technique used to predict ambulatory atrial fibrillation (AF), using recordings of only one hour showing good accuracy. This system, however, has not yet been used to predict the emergence of POAF. The rationale for its use is based on the suspicion that the emergence of POAF is strongly related to sympatho-vagal imbalance and the increase in atrial ectopia, that is, changes in heart rhythm, the main variables analyzed by the SRA algorithm.
objectiveTo assess the accuracy of the SRA to identify patients at risk of having POAF after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).
method114 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease underwent coronary artery bypass grafting between the years 2015 and 2018. Between the first and fifth postoperative days, they underwent continuous electrocardiographic monitoring using the Holter system for cardiac rhythm analysis. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I was formed of those with POAF and Group II included patients without POAF. The tracings obtained by Holter were reanalyzed using the CardioManager®/Cardios program, converted and divided into one-hour sections using the SRA®/Cardios and Geratherm Converter program and submitted to the SRA-Apoplex medical/Geratherm® analysis algorithm. The SRA identifies three possibilities for classifying patient risk: a) Risk 0: patient in sinus rhythm; b) Risk 1: patient at increased risk for paroxysmal AF; c) Risk 2: patient with AF already present. For Group I, SRA were considered positive when Risks 1 and 2 were identified. For Group II, those identified as Risk 0 were considered negative SRA.
resultsPOAF occurred in 33/114 patients (28%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the SRA to identify patients with POAF were 69%, 84%, 69%, and 82%, respectively; the positive and negative likelihood ratios, in addition to the accuracy of the SRA were, respectively, 4.3%, 0.36%, and 79%. A subanalysis of the results of the day on which AF occurred was performed on the records obtained in the first three hours of recording and up to three hours before the appearance of POAF. In the first period, the SRA was able to predict POAF in 57% of cases, while in the second period, the system identified the arrhythmia in 83% of cases.
conclusionsa) The SRA presents good accuracy to predict POAF; b) its accuracy is moderate in the first three hours of recording; c) the accuracy increases significantly near the beginning of POAF; d) these findings indicate that electrophysiological changes that precede POAF are acute, occurring a few hours before the event and are identified by the SRA algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.