Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36920974›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2023

Data heterogeneity in federated learning with Electronic Health Records: Case studies of risk prediction for acute kidney injury and sepsis diseases in critical care.

Suraj Rajendran, Zhenxing Xu, Weishen Pan, Arnab Ghosh, Fei Wang

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Federated systems for automated infection surveillance: a perspective.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suraj RajendranTri-Institutional Computational Biology & Medicine Program, Cornell University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8149-0157
Zhenxing XuDivision of Health Informatics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Weishen PanDivision of Health Informatics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Arnab GhoshDepartments of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Fei WangDivision of Health Informatics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9459-9461

Funding

Computational Drug Repurposing for AD/ADRD with Integrative Analysis of Real World Data and Biomedical KnowledgeR01AG076234 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Jiang Bian, Fei Wang · 2022 to 2026
$3.8M
Tri-Institutional Training Program in Computational Biology & MedicineT32GM083937 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI CHRISTINI, DAVID J. · 2009 to 2018
$3.1M
Identification of Mild Cognitive Impairment using Machine Learning from Language and Behavior MarkersRF1AG072449 · NIA · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DODGE, HIROKO HAYAMA, WANG, FEI · 2021 to 2023
$2.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG076234NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG072449NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM083937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the wider availability of healthcare data such as Electronic Health Records (EHR), more and more data-driven based approaches have been proposed to improve the quality-of-care delivery. Predictive modeling, which aims at building computational models for predicting clinical risk, is a popular research topic in healthcare analytics. However, concerns about privacy of healthcare data may hinder the development of effective predictive models that are generalizable because this often requires rich diverse data from multiple clinical institutions. Recently, federated learning (FL) has demonstrated promise in addressing this concern. However, data heterogeneity from different local participating sites may affect prediction performance of federated models. Due to acute kidney injury (AKI) and sepsis' high prevalence among patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU), the early prediction of these conditions based on AI is an important topic in critical care medicine. In this study, we take AKI and sepsis onset risk prediction in ICU as two examples to explore the impact of data heterogeneity in the FL framework as well as compare performances across frameworks. We built predictive models based on local, pooled, and FL frameworks using EHR data across multiple hospitals. The local framework only used data from each site itself. The pooled framework combined data from all sites. In the FL framework, each local site did not have access to other sites' data. A model was updated locally, and its parameters were shared to a central aggregator, which was used to update the federated model's parameters and then subsequently, shared with each site. We found models built within a FL framework outperformed local counterparts. Then, we analyzed variable importance discrepancies across sites and frameworks. Finally, we explored potential sources of the heterogeneity within the EHR data. The different distributions of demographic profiles, medication use, and site information contributed to data heterogeneity.

Identifiers

PMID36920974
PMCPMC10016691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read12
identifiers read12
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.