ArticlePloS one2023
The effects of nearby trees on the positional accuracy of GNSS receivers in a forest environment.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy Assessment of iPhone LiDAR for Mapping Streambeds and Small Water Structures in Forested Terrain.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- New Possibilities of Field Data Survey in Forest Road Design.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Performance Evaluation of Real-Time Kinematic Global Navigation Satellite System with Survey-Grade Receivers and Short Observation Times in Forested Areas.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Global Navigation Satellite System Receiver Positioning in Harsh Environments via Clock Bias Prediction by Empirical Mode Decomposition and Back Propagation Neural Network Method.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Robotic monitoring of forests: a dataset from the EU habitat 9210* in the Tuscan Apennines (central Italy).Scientific data · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global Navigational Satellite System (GNSS) technologies are actively being developed to address the demand for enhanced positional accuracy. Smartphones are the most prevalent GNSS receiver today and have garnered attention thanks to improved positional accuracy and usability that can be accessed at an affordable price. In a forested environment, multipath error can deteriorate the positional accuracy, depending on the state of nearby vegetation. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the impacts of the size and location of vegetation on positional accuracy of GNSS receivers to determine whether the errors observed are systematic. Twenty-six control points within the Whitehall Forest GPS Test site in Athens, Georgia were used to evaluate positional accuracy of three different GNSS receivers (two traditional handheld GNSS receivers (including Garmin and Trimble receivers) and a smartphone). Thirty-five forest variables were developed from information around each control point to conduct a correlation analysis with observed horizontal position error in the positions determined by each device. In this study, we confirmed that the positional error of the smartphone was significantly lower than the Garmin receiver, and similar, but significantly different than the positional error observed by the Trimble receiver. It was confirmed that correlations between forest variables and horizontal position error regardless of the GNSS receiver employed were significant, yet trends were not consistent. The effect of the size of nearby trees on horizontal position error could not be generalized; however, the location of nearby trees on horizontal position error could.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.