Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36920959›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

How message appeals and prior product use influence information processing, risk perceptions, trust, attitudes, and genetic test purchase intentions.

Matthew S VanDyke, Nicole M Lee, Alan Abitbol, Stephen W Rush

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew S VanDykeDepartment of Advertising & Public Relations, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2905-3099
Nicole M LeeSchool of Social & Behavioral Sciences, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3101-4969
Alan AbitbolDepartment of Communication, University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio, United States of America.
Stephen W RushMike Curb College of Entertainment & Music Business, Belmont University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7834-5637
Arizona State University · USBelmont University · USUniversity of Alabama · USUniversity of Dayton · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic test industry, attracting customers can be difficult especially due to the highly sensitive nature of these products. How these tests are communicated to consumers may be one avenue in which companies can impact customer purchase intentions. A 2 (message sidedness: one-way vs. two-way refutational) x 2 (hedging: present vs. absent) between-subjects experiment was conducted to understand how message features and prior product use influence information processing, risk and trust perceptions, and attitude toward the genetic test, which in turn, may influence direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic test purchase intentions. Results demonstrated that having used a genetic test in the past predicted participants' trust in the company, information processing, and risk judgments; however, among those who used a genetic test, viewing a message that included hedging tended to increase their trust in the message. Trust in the message and company, information processing, and risk judgments significantly predicted participants' attitudes toward genetic testing, which in turn predicted their purchase intentions. The results suggest that in the context of DTC genetic test messaging, practitioners should strive to increase consumer trust in the message and the company and facilitate information processing, and they should work to diminish perceived risk. These results suggest opportunities for identifying other message features that may influence message and company trust, information processing, risk judgments, and attitudes related to DTC genetic testing.

Indexed as

IntentionTrustAttitudeCognitionGenetic TestingHumans

Identifiers

PMID36920959
PMCPMC10016637
OpenAlexW4324311401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read40
identifiers read8
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.