Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36920952›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

New estimates of genome size in Orthoptera and their evolutionary implications.

Oliver Hawlitschek, David Sadílek, Lara-Sophie Dey, Katharina Buchholz, Sajad Noori, Inci Livia Baez, Timo Wehrt, Jason Brozio, Pavel Trávníček, Matthias Seidel and 1 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A genome survey ofZooKeys · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The genome sequence of the oak bush-cricket,Wellcome open research · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Oliver HawlitschekLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB), Museum of Nature, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8010-4157
David SadílekInstitute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, Centre of Oncocytogenomics, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lara-Sophie DeyLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB), Museum of Nature, Hamburg, Germany.
Katharina BuchholzLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB), Museum of Nature, Hamburg, Germany.
Sajad NooriLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB), Museum of Nature, Hamburg, Germany.
Inci Livia BaezLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB), Museum of Nature, Hamburg, Germany.
Timo WehrtLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB), Museum of Nature, Hamburg, Germany.
Jason BrozioZoologische Staatssammlung München (ZSM-SNSB), München, Germany.
Pavel TrávníčekCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
Matthias SeidelNaturhistorisches Museum Wien, Wien, Austria.
Martin HusemannLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB), Museum of Nature, Hamburg, Germany.
Museum für Naturkunde · DEBavarian State Collection of Zoology · DECzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany · CZGeneral University Hospital in Prague · CZNatural History Museum Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal genomes vary widely in size, and much of their architecture and content remains poorly understood. Even among related groups, such as orders of insects, genomes may vary in size by orders of magnitude-for reasons unknown. The largest known insect genomes were repeatedly found in Orthoptera, e.g., Podisma pedestris (1C = 16.93 pg), Stethophyma grossum (1C = 18.48 pg) and Bryodemella holdereri (1C = 18.64 pg). While all these species belong to the suborder of Caelifera, the ensiferan Deracantha onos (1C = 19.60 pg) was recently found to have the largest genome. Here, we present new genome size estimates of 50 further species of Ensifera (superfamilies Gryllidea, Tettigoniidea) and Caelifera (Acrididae, Tetrigidae) based on flow cytometric measurements. We found that Bryodemella tuberculata (Caelifera: Acrididae) has the so far largest measured genome of all insects with 1C = 21.96 pg (21.48 gBp). Species of Orthoptera with 2n = 16 and 2n = 22 chromosomes have significantly larger genomes than species with other chromosome counts. Gryllidea genomes vary between 1C = 0.95 and 2.88 pg, and Tetrigidae between 1C = 2.18 and 2.41, while the genomes of all other studied Orthoptera range in size from 1C = 1.37 to 21.96 pg. Reconstructing ancestral genome sizes based on a phylogenetic tree of mitochondrial genomic data, we found genome size values of >15.84 pg only for the nodes of Bryodemella holdereri / B. tuberculata and Chrysochraon dispar / Euthystira brachyptera. The predicted values of ancestral genome sizes are 6.19 pg for Orthoptera, 5.37 pg for Ensifera, and 7.28 pg for Caelifera. The reasons for the large genomes in Orthoptera remain largely unknown, but a duplication or polyploidization seems unlikely as chromosome numbers do not differ much. Sequence-based genomic studies may shed light on the underlying evolutionary mechanisms.

Indexed as

GrasshoppersOrthopteraAnimalsBiological EvolutionGenome, InsectGenome SizePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID36920952
PMCPMC10016648
OpenAlexW4324306002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read21
identifiers read11
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.