ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023
Geometric and dosimetric evaluation of deep learning based auto-segmentation for clinical target volume on breast cancer.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep ensemble optimized models for probabilistic CTV breast segmentation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Geometrically focused training and evaluation of organs-at-risk segmentation via deep learning.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Breast Cancer Management: From Data to the Clinic.Cancer innovation · 2025Review
- Development and external multicentric validation of a deep learning-based clinical target volume segmentation model for whole-breast radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- CBCT-based synthetic CT image generation using a diffusion model for CBCT-guided lung radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Geometric and dosimetric evaluation for breast and regional nodal auto-segmentation structures.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Review of Deep Learning Based Autosegmentation for Clinical Target Volume: Current Status and Future Directions.Advances in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Experimental Examination of Conventional, Semi-Automatic, and Automatic Volumetry Tools for Segmentation of Pulmonary Nodules in a Phantom Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Geometric and dosimetric evaluation of deep learning based auto-segmentation for clinical target volume on breast cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently, target auto-segmentation techniques based on deep learning (DL) have shown promising results. However, inaccurate target delineation will directly affect the treatment planning dose distribution and the effect of subsequent radiotherapy work. Evaluation based on geometric metrics alone may not be sufficient for target delineation accuracy assessment. The purpose of this paper is to validate the performance of automatic segmentation with dosimetric metrics and try to construct new evaluation geometric metrics to comprehensively understand the dose-response relationship from the perspective of clinical application. MATERIALS AND
methodsA DL-based target segmentation model was developed by using 186 manual delineation modified radical mastectomy breast cancer cases. The resulting DL model were used to generate alternative target contours in a new set of 48 patients. The Auto-plan was reoptimized to ensure the same optimized parameters as the reference Manual-plan. To assess the dosimetric impact of target auto-segmentation, not only common geometric metrics but also new spatial parameters with distance and relative volume (
resultsOnly strong (|R
conclusionsCurrent geometric metrics could reflect a certain degree of dose effect of target variation. To find target contour variations that do lead to OARs dosimetry changes, clinically oriented metrics that more accurately reflect how segmentation quality affects dosimetry should be constructed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.