Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36920901›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023

Geometric and dosimetric evaluation of deep learning based auto-segmentation for clinical target volume on breast cancer.

Yang Zhong, Ying Guo, Yingtao Fang, Zhiqiang Wu, Jiazhou Wang, Weigang Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yang ZhongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Ying GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Yingtao FangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Zhiqiang WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Jiazhou WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Weigang HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, target auto-segmentation techniques based on deep learning (DL) have shown promising results. However, inaccurate target delineation will directly affect the treatment planning dose distribution and the effect of subsequent radiotherapy work. Evaluation based on geometric metrics alone may not be sufficient for target delineation accuracy assessment. The purpose of this paper is to validate the performance of automatic segmentation with dosimetric metrics and try to construct new evaluation geometric metrics to comprehensively understand the dose-response relationship from the perspective of clinical application. MATERIALS AND

methodsA DL-based target segmentation model was developed by using 186 manual delineation modified radical mastectomy breast cancer cases. The resulting DL model were used to generate alternative target contours in a new set of 48 patients. The Auto-plan was reoptimized to ensure the same optimized parameters as the reference Manual-plan. To assess the dosimetric impact of target auto-segmentation, not only common geometric metrics but also new spatial parameters with distance and relative volume (

resultsOnly strong (|R

conclusionsCurrent geometric metrics could reflect a certain degree of dose effect of target variation. To find target contour variations that do lead to OARs dosimetry changes, clinically oriented metrics that more accurately reflect how segmentation quality affects dosimetry should be constructed.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningFemaleHumansMastectomyOrgans at RiskRadiometryRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assistedauto-segmentationdosimetric impactgeometric metricsradiotherapy target

Identifiers

PMID36920901
PMCPMC10338811
OpenAlexW4324305998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.