Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36920777›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2022

Deep Learning for Synthetic CT from Bone MRI in the Head and Neck.

S Bambach, M-L Ho

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Current State of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Applications for Head and Neck MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S BambachFrom the Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital (S.B.), Columbus, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-0411-6073
M-L HoDepartment of Radiology (M.-L.H.), Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio. lan.ho@nationwidechildrens.org.ORCID 0000-0002-9455-1350
Nationwide Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeBone MR imaging techniques enable visualization of cortical bone without the need for ionizing radiation. Automated conversion of bone MR imaging to synthetic CT is highly desirable for downstream image processing and eventual clinical adoption. Given the complex anatomy and pathology of the head and neck, deep learning models are ideally suited for learning such mapping. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a retrospective study of 39 pediatric and adult patients with bone MR imaging and CT examinations of the head and neck. For each patient, MR imaging and CT data sets were spatially coregistered using multiple-point affine transformation. Paired MR imaging and CT slices were generated for model training, using 4-fold cross-validation. We trained 3 different encoder-decoder models: Light_U-Net (2 million parameters) and VGG-16 U-Net (29 million parameters) without and with transfer learning. Loss functions included mean absolute error, mean squared error, and a weighted average. Performance metrics included Pearson

resultsThe Light_U-Net architecture quantitatively outperformed VGG-16 models. Mean absolute error loss resulted in higher bone precision, while mean squared error yielded higher bone recall. Performance metrics decreased when using training data captured only in a different environment but increased when local training data were augmented with those from different hospitals, vendors, or MR imaging techniques.

conclusionsWe have optimized a robust deep learning model for conversion of bone MR imaging to synthetic CT, which shows good performance and generalizability when trained on different hospitals, vendors, and MR imaging techniques. This approach shows promise for facilitating downstream image processing and adoption into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAdultChildHeadHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID36920777
PMCPMC9575432
OpenAlexW4290673779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.