Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36920736›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2023

In-line warming reduces in-line pressure of subcutaneous infusion of concentrated immunoglobulins.

Peter Leidenmühler, Joris Höfinghoff, Norbert Haider, Gerald Brachtl, Markus Weiller, Ivan Bilic, Bagirath Gangadharan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter LeidenmühlerTakeda Company, Baxalta Innovations GmbH, Donau City Strasse 7, Vienna, 1220, Austria. peter.leidenmuehler@takeda.com.
Joris HöfinghoffBaxter AG, Takeda Company, Vienna, Austria.
Norbert HaiderBaxter AG, Takeda Company, Vienna, Austria.
Gerald BrachtlBaxter AG, Takeda Company, Vienna, Austria.
Markus WeillerTakeda Company, Baxalta Innovations GmbH, Donau City Strasse 7, Vienna, 1220, Austria.
Ivan BilicTakeda Company, Baxalta Innovations GmbH, Donau City Strasse 7, Vienna, 1220, Austria.
Bagirath GangadharanTakeda Company, Baxalta Innovations GmbH, Donau City Strasse 7, Vienna, 1220, Austria.
Takeda (Austria) · ATBaxter (Austria) · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy is a life-saving treatment in patients with immunodeficiency and effective in the management of autoimmune disorders. Immunoglobulins are administered intravenously or subcutaneously, with the latter route reducing systemic reactions and providing an option for self-infusion, increasing patient convenience, while decreasing patient burden, healthcare utilization, and costs. A major limitation with subcutaneous administrations is the frequency of infusion due to limited volumes administrable into subcutaneous space, necessitating increased drug concentration, absorption, and dispersion. Increasing the concentration of immunoglobulins from 10 to 20% halves the required volume, but leads to higher dynamic viscosity, limiting infusion rate. Recombinant human hyaluronidase increases dispersion and absorption of immunoglobulins allowing administration of ≤ 600 mL per site, but does not change viscosity. Since the viscosity of fluids depends on temperature, we tested the feasibility of in-line warming of immunoglobulin formulations to physiological temperatures. In vitro analysis showed no negative impact of in-line warming to 38 °C on product quality. Subcutaneous infusion studies in pigs confirmed the feasibility of infusion rates of up to 7.5 mL/min with in-line warmed TAK-881, an immunoglobulin 20% facilitated with recombinant human hyaluronidase. In-line pressures were reduced compared with conventional immunoglobulin 20%, and local tolerance was not altered. Reduction of in-line pressures was more pronounced with thinner needle sets, indicating a potential benefit for patients. In summary, an in in-line warming device can circumvent the limitation of high viscosity, while product quality and local tolerance are maintained. The results of the presented studies warrant further testing in a phase 1 clinical study.

Indexed as

HyaluronoglucosaminidaseImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesAnimalsHumansImmunoglobulinsInfusions, SubcutaneousInjections, SubcutaneousSwineHyaluronoglucosaminidaseImmunoglobulinsCUVITRUfSCIG 20%HYQVIAImmunoglobulinsrHuPH20SCIGSCIG 20%Subcutaneous administrationTAK-881

Identifiers

PMID36920736
PMCPMC10382333
OpenAlexW4324308751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.