Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36920731›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2023

Utility of flow diverters in treatment of acutely ruptured uncoilable aneurysms of the posterior circulation of the brain.

Halitcan Batur, Jeremy Lynch, Bige Sayin, Shahram Derakhshani, Ilkay Akmangit, Ergun Daglioglu, Anil Arat

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Halitcan BaturDepartment of Radiology, Nigde Omer Halisdemir University, Nigde, Turkey.
Jeremy LynchDepartment of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Essex Center for Neurological Sciences, Queen's University Hospital, Greater London, Romford, UK.
Bige SayinDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Ankara City Hospital, Universiteler Mh. 1604. Cd Cankaya, 06800, Ankara, Turkey.
Shahram DerakhshaniDepartment of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Essex Center for Neurological Sciences, Queen's University Hospital, Greater London, Romford, UK.
Ilkay AkmangitDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Ankara City Hospital, Universiteler Mh. 1604. Cd Cankaya, 06800, Ankara, Turkey.
Ergun DagliogluDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Anil AratDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. anilarat@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAim of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of flow diverters (FDs) in treatment of acutely ruptured posterior circulation aneurysms MATERIALS AND

methodsDatabases of three participating institutions were retrospectively scanned for patients in whom FD placement was attempted for treatment of acutely ruptured vertebrobasilar aneurysms. An interval of 14 days or fewer between the latest ictus and treatment was used as inclusion criterion. Patients with dolichoectasia of vertebrobasilar arteries were excluded. If necessary, adjunctive techniques including coiling or stenting were utilized. Clinical outcomes were graded using mWFNS (modified World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Scale) and mRS (modified Rankin Scale). Aneurysmal occlusion was defined as Raymond-Roy Class 1. Spearman's (ρ) test was used to assess the correlation between variables. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess outcomes.

results31 patients (25 women, mean age: 52.7 ± 15.2) harboring 32 aneurysms (16 non-saccular, mean size: 11.4 ± 7 mm) were included. Mean number of FDs used was 1.22 ± 0.42. In six cases, adjunctive coiling and in five cases, apposing stent placement were used. Overall mortality rate and procedure-related mortality rates were 22.5% (7/31) and 9.6% (3/31), respectively. At a mean imaging follow-up of 17.2 ± 12.6 months, total occlusion was achieved in 22 aneurysms (91.6%). Univariate analysis showed that mortality was positively correlated with vasospasm (ρ = 0.600, p < 0.05), higher mWFNS Scale (ρ = 0.685, p < 0.05), higher modified Fischer Score (ρ = 0.609, p < 0.05), higher mRS (ρ = 0.594, p < 0.05) on admission and negatively correlated with saccular morphology (ρ = -0.529, p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified mWFNS on admission as a significant predictor. (OR: 7.148, 95% CI 1.777-28.758, p: 0.01). Adjunctive coiling positively correlated with aneurysm occlusion. (ρ = 0.522, p < 0.05).

conclusionThe procedure-related morbidity and mortality is not negligible. However, the risks and efficacy associated with FDs are acceptable, especially when adjunctive coiling is possible, given the lack of treatment alternatives.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmAdultAgedBrainFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment OutcomeAneurysmsEmbolizationFlow diversionHemorrhage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.